Kevin Walzer wrote:
> I used to maintain packages of SPE on OS X: it was a nicely-designed
> application but very unstable. It crashed constantly.
>
> I've looked at the new version: it seems even more slick than before.
> Not sure about how stable it is.
Someone gave Stani a Mac, and I know he's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> Am 2006-01-13 um 23:59 schrieb Christopher Barker:
>> by the way, there are a number of IDEs for python on OS-X, and last I
>> heard, none of them were really bug-free enough to use for a
>> newbie. Has
>> that changed?
>
Am 2006-01-13 um 23:59 schrieb Christopher Barker:
> by the way, there are a number of IDEs for python on OS-X, and last I
> heard, none of them were really bug-free enough to use for a
> newbie. Has
> that changed?
>
> How's SPE on OS-X now?
It works and is becoming better and better, but you m
> Your programs are probably behaving correctly. What's happening is
> that none of those application building tools have an option that
> attaches a console to them, so your simple console interaction isn't
> going to work.
Your output is probably going to the "Console" open that up and
On Jan 13, 2006, at 12:43 PM, Nathaniel Rhein wrote:
> I know it'd be better to post this to a primarily MacPython group,
> but this is pretty much all I could find for Python.
> I'm very novice as far as programming languages go; basically I
> leanred Basic a while back and now, wanting to ge
I know it'd be better to post this to a primarily MacPython group, but this is pretty much all I could find for Python.I'm very novice as far as programming languages go; basically I leanred Basic a while back and now, wanting to get into a more advanced langage, chose Python. I really don't know m
