On Apr 19, 2006, at 12:01 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
> On 19-apr-2006, at 0:11, Jacob Rus wrote:
>> I wrote:
>>> I couldn't compile [psyco][1] using the 2.4.3 universal version of
>>> Python on my 12" powerbook. I'm wondering if this is just a problem
>>> with universal Python, or if psycho doesn'
On 19-apr-2006, at 0:11, Jacob Rus wrote:
> I wrote:
>> I couldn't compile [psyco][1] using the 2.4.3 universal version of
>> Python on my 12" powerbook. I'm wondering if this is just a problem
>> with universal Python, or if psycho doesn't compile in general
>> under OS X.
>
> Argh, never min
Jacob Rus wrote:
> Argh, never mind that message. I see now that psyco is clearly labeled
> as only working on i386. Nothing to see here, move along.
It'd be nice to know how/if it works on an Intel Mac, however. Anyone?
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
I wrote:
> I couldn't compile [psyco][1] using the 2.4.3 universal version of
> Python on my 12" powerbook. I'm wondering if this is just a problem
> with universal Python, or if psycho doesn't compile in general under OS X.
Argh, never mind that message. I see now that psyco is clearly labele
Hi,
I couldn't compile [psyco][1] using the 2.4.3 universal version of
Python on my 12" powerbook. I'm wondering if this is just a problem
with universal Python, or if psycho doesn't compile in general under OS X.
Thanks for any help,
-Jacob
[1]: http://psyco.sourceforge.net/
Here's what the
