Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Questions about various bits of Intel status

2006-03-23 Thread Andrew Barnert
Andrew Barnert: > > What are the actual problems with having a root/wheel > > 755 framework directory instead of root/admin 775? I > > guess it means you can't install modules to > > site-packages out of .pkg files? If it's important, it > > would be nice if it were easier to do properly. Ronald O

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Questions about various bits of Intel status

2006-03-23 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 23-mrt-2006, at 0:31, Andrew Barnert wrote: > Thanks for the quick answers, and it's good to know > that I'm not missing information right in front of my > face > > Me: >>> First, what's up with ctypes and other things that >>> need libffi? > > Ronald: >> PyObjC contains a port of libffi t

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Questions about various bits of Intel status

2006-03-22 Thread Andrew Barnert
Thanks for the quick answers, and it's good to know that I'm not missing information right in front of my face Me: > > First, what's up with ctypes and other things that > > need libffi? Ronald: > PyObjC contains a port of libffi to darwin/x86, but sadly > enough I didn't pay enough attentio

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Questions about various bits of Intel status

2006-03-22 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 22-mrt-2006, at 9:45, Andrew Barnert wrote: > I'm guessing these answers are all out there > somewhere, but I can't find them. So I apologize if > I'm being stupid, but: > > First, what's up with ctypes and other things that > need libffi? They complain that it hasn't been ported > to darwin x

[Pythonmac-SIG] Questions about various bits of Intel status

2006-03-22 Thread Andrew Barnert
I'm guessing these answers are all out there somewhere, but I can't find them. So I apologize if I'm being stupid, but: First, what's up with ctypes and other things that need libffi? They complain that it hasn't been ported to darwin x86 and punt. The latest information I could find was a blog at