Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Terminal to not have an application signature in Leopard

2006-10-18 Thread has
On 18 Oct 2006, at 14:20, Kevin Walzer wrote: > I hope EasyDialogs remains in Python, however (I have one application > that depends on it). A built-in module for basic message and file dialogs is useful. The current ED implementation needs work, however, as it doesn't fully support long stri

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Terminal to not have an application signature in Leopard

2006-10-18 Thread Kevin Walzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 has wrote: > > I'm not sure offhand what the position is on Framework and W; > probably also abandoned as they're obsolete and newer alternatives > already exist. I'm pretty sure these depend on the WASTE library, which is obsolete. The old Pyt

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Terminal to not have an application signature in Leopard

2006-10-18 Thread has
Edward Moy wrote: > Hi, all, I'm the maintainer of python at Apple. There is a plan to > remove Terminal's application signature 'trmx' in Leopard, to avoid > some exploits that the application signature allows. Apple Events > can use the bundle ID (typeApplicationBundleID) instead, though

[Pythonmac-SIG] Terminal to not have an application signature in Leopard

2006-10-18 Thread Edward Moy
Hi, all, I'm the maintainer of python at Apple. There is a plan to remove Terminal's application signature 'trmx' in Leopard, to avoid some exploits that the application signature allows. Apple Events can use the bundle ID (typeApplicationBundleID) instead, though this only works on 10.3