On 27-okt-2005, at 18:48, Zhi Peng wrote:
> Hi! Chris
>
> Thanks a lot for your email. It is exactly what I would like to have.
>
> I use MacPython 2.3. But unfortunately, on my Mac 10.4 Tiger, they
> erased all *.py file and leave all *.pyc or *.pyd file. I even can
> not find include direct
On Oct 27, 2005, at 10:14 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> One other note. The system compiler for OS-X 10.4 is gcc 4.*, which
> is a
> bit more picky about standards compliance than gcc3.*, so some code
> won't compile with it. I think Xcode tools comes with both,
> however, and
> there is a script
Zhi Peng wrote:
> Hi! Chris Thanks a lot for your email. It is exactly what I would
> like to have. I use MacPython 2.3. But unfortunately, on my Mac 10.4
> Tiger,
Are you using the 2.3 that Apple provided? If so, I think the headers
you need are there, but I don't have Tiger. If they are not the
Hi! Chris
Thanks a lot for your email. It is exactly what I would like to have.
I use MacPython 2.3. But unfortunately, on my Mac 10.4 Tiger, they erased all *.py file and leave all *.pyc or *.pyd file. I even can not find include directory or headers directory on this new Mac. If MacPython i
Zhi Peng wrote:
> I has some small program in C which is compiled as .so library in
> Linux and I can directly import name_of_lib.so as a module from
> python when I run it on Linux. It looks same if I just see them from
> Terminal window on Mac. Did anyone compile any C code as library
> called by
Hi! All
I has some small program in C which is compiled as .so library in Linux and I can directly import name_of_lib.so as a module from python when I run it on Linux. It looks same if I just see them from Terminal window on Mac. Did anyone compile any C code as library called by MacPython or f
