I'm flexible: I'll use what py2app requires. I hope most other
developers are in the same situation.
Python 2.6 sounds like an excellent choice to me. There are binary
installers for most common 3rd party packages, so it's easy to adopt
(unlike Python 2.7).
-- Russell
In article <4deadfb9-6aa
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
Hi,
What is the minimal python version that peoply actually use py2app with?
2.6.* for me -- I have some older stuff still on 2.5.*, but I'm
perfectly happy to port that when I need to update.
Backward compatibility is nice, but if it gets in the way of getting
thing
I use py2app with Python 2.5.
Even though I'm keen to move to 2.6 (and then 2.7), I would _guess_ that
quite a few people are still using Python 2.5.
Cheers, Brendan.
On 26/07/10 11:04 AM, pythonmac-sig-requ...@python.org wrote:
> Subject:
> [Pythonmac-SIG] py2app and python vers
Hi,
What is the minimal python version that peoply actually use py2app with?
I want to do some development on py2app and related package later this year to
make it fully support python eggs and may want to modernize the code while
doing that. The amount of modernization that is possible depend
