Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] More testers needed: Fix installer v1.1

2004-12-28 Thread Jack Jansen
There's a new one, with a new name and the environment bug fixed: . Please give it a try, -- Jack Jansen, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] More testers needed: Fix installer

2004-12-27 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Dec 27, 2004, at 2:53 PM, Jack Jansen wrote: On 27-dec-04, at 17:44, Bob Ippolito wrote: You can find the package at . The Makefile is missing the MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.3 before the $(CC) .. which means that for most people, it won't

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] More testers needed: Fix installer

2004-12-27 Thread Jack Jansen
On 27-dec-04, at 17:44, Bob Ippolito wrote: You can find the package at . The Makefile is missing the MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.3 before the $(CC) .. which means that for most people, it won't compile extension modules, because not everyon

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] More testers needed: Fix installer

2004-12-27 Thread Jack Jansen
On 27-dec-04, at 17:47, Michael Hudson wrote: On 27 Dec 2004, at 16:38, Bob Ippolito wrote: On Dec 27, 2004, at 11:31 AM, Michael Hudson wrote: But 10.3 is Panther, not Jaguar, right? Yes. That was rhetorical :) I'm not being completely thick, am I? The file should surely be called PantherPythonF

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] More testers needed: Fix installer

2004-12-27 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Dec 27, 2004, at 12:09 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: On 27-dec-04, at 17:44, Bob Ippolito wrote: On Dec 27, 2004, at 8:08 AM, Jack Jansen wrote: Ok, Bob, you win:-) I've created an installer package that replaces the Makefile after a simple test that you're actually running 10.3 and have that Make

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] More testers needed: Fix installer

2004-12-27 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 27-dec-04, at 17:44, Bob Ippolito wrote: On Dec 27, 2004, at 8:08 AM, Jack Jansen wrote: Ok, Bob, you win:-) I've created an installer package that replaces the Makefile after a simple test that you're actually running 10.3 and have that Makefile in the right place (i.e. didn't mess too much w

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] More testers needed: Fix installer

2004-12-27 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Dec 27, 2004, at 11:59 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: On 27-dec-04, at 17:50, Bob Ippolito wrote: On Dec 27, 2004, at 11:47 AM, Michael Hudson wrote: On 27 Dec 2004, at 16:38, Bob Ippolito wrote: On Dec 27, 2004, at 11:31 AM, Michael Hudson wrote: But 10.3 is Panther, not Jaguar, right? Yes. That wa

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] More testers needed: Fix installer

2004-12-27 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 27-dec-04, at 17:50, Bob Ippolito wrote: On Dec 27, 2004, at 11:47 AM, Michael Hudson wrote: On 27 Dec 2004, at 16:38, Bob Ippolito wrote: On Dec 27, 2004, at 11:31 AM, Michael Hudson wrote: But 10.3 is Panther, not Jaguar, right? Yes. That was rhetorical :) I'm not being completely thick, am I?

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] More testers needed: Fix installer

2004-12-27 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Dec 27, 2004, at 11:47 AM, Michael Hudson wrote: On 27 Dec 2004, at 16:38, Bob Ippolito wrote: On Dec 27, 2004, at 11:31 AM, Michael Hudson wrote: But 10.3 is Panther, not Jaguar, right? Yes. That was rhetorical :) I'm not being completely thick, am I? The file should surely be called PantherP

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] More testers needed: Fix installer

2004-12-27 Thread Michael Hudson
On 27 Dec 2004, at 16:38, Bob Ippolito wrote: On Dec 27, 2004, at 11:31 AM, Michael Hudson wrote: But 10.3 is Panther, not Jaguar, right? Yes. That was rhetorical :) I'm not being completely thick, am I? The file should surely be called PantherPythonFix.dmg. Cheers, mwh _

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] More testers needed: Fix installer

2004-12-27 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Dec 27, 2004, at 8:08 AM, Jack Jansen wrote: Ok, Bob, you win:-) I've created an installer package that replaces the Makefile after a simple test that you're actually running 10.3 and have that Makefile in the right place (i.e. didn't mess too much with your installation). If people could tes

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] More testers needed: Fix installer

2004-12-27 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Dec 27, 2004, at 11:31 AM, Michael Hudson wrote: Jack Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On 27-dec-04, at 15:04, Michael Hudson wrote: Indeed you can, and it seems to work (tm) on Panther here, but I'm *reasonably* sure you have chosen the wrong name for the package :) Yeah, consider that a work

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] More testers needed: Fix installer

2004-12-27 Thread Michael Hudson
Jack Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 27-dec-04, at 15:04, Michael Hudson wrote: >> Indeed you can, and it seems to work (tm) on Panther here, but I'm >> *reasonably* sure you have chosen the wrong name for the package :) > > Yeah, consider that a working title. I may call it "The Installer

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] More testers needed: Fix installer

2004-12-27 Thread Markus Weissmann
On 27. Dec 2004, at 14:08 Uhr, Jack Jansen wrote: Ok, Bob, you win:-) I've created an installer package that replaces the Makefile after a simple test that you're actually running 10.3 and have that Makefile in the right place (i.e. didn't mess too much with your installation). If people could t

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] More testers needed: Fix installer

2004-12-27 Thread Jack Jansen
On 27-dec-04, at 15:04, Michael Hudson wrote: Indeed you can, and it seems to work (tm) on Panther here, but I'm *reasonably* sure you have chosen the wrong name for the package :) Yeah, consider that a working title. I may call it "The Installer that makes Apple-Installed Python on 10.3 build cor

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] More testers needed: Fix installer

2004-12-27 Thread Michael Hudson
Jack Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok, Bob, you win:-) > > I've created an installer package that replaces the Makefile after a > simple test that you're actually running 10.3 and have that Makefile > in the right place (i.e. didn't mess too much with your installation). > > If people could