Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Terminal to not have an application signature in Leopard

2006-10-18 Thread has
On 18 Oct 2006, at 14:20, Kevin Walzer wrote: > I hope EasyDialogs remains in Python, however (I have one application > that depends on it). A built-in module for basic message and file dialogs is useful. The current ED implementation needs work, however, as it doesn't fully support long stri

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Terminal to not have an application signature in Leopard

2006-10-18 Thread Kevin Walzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 has wrote: > > I'm not sure offhand what the position is on Framework and W; > probably also abandoned as they're obsolete and newer alternatives > already exist. I'm pretty sure these depend on the WASTE library, which is obsolete. The old Pyt

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Terminal to not have an application signature in Leopard

2006-10-18 Thread has
Edward Moy wrote: > Hi, all, I'm the maintainer of python at Apple. There is a plan to > remove Terminal's application signature 'trmx' in Leopard, to avoid > some exploits that the application signature allows. Apple Events > can use the bundle ID (typeApplicationBundleID) instead, though