On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
> Packagemaker should't be problem here, although the build procedure might
> be problematic: IIRC the app bundle contains symlinks where the target
> is an absolute path, and therefore you need to create the app from
> sources that are alrea
On 4 Apr, 2013, at 17:01, Nat Echols wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Ronald Oussoren
> wrote:
>>> Replying to my own post: after sending this, I read the section in the
>>> documentation about "alias mode". This seems to work fine, and
>>> produces an app that is 50KB instead of near
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Nat Echols wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Ronald Oussoren
> wrote:
>> An alias mode build contains symlinks to the python files in your
>> application, and is therefore not a useful way to deploy.
>
> It's still not totally clear to me if this is reall
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>> Replying to my own post: after sending this, I read the section in the
>> documentation about "alias mode". This seems to work fine, and
>> produces an app that is 50KB instead of nearly 9MB. Since I'm running
>> this script as part of a
On 4 Apr, 2013, at 1:12, Nat Echols wrote:
> Replying to my own post: after sending this, I read the section in the
> documentation about "alias mode". This seems to work fine, and
> produces an app that is 50KB instead of nearly 9MB. Since I'm running
> this script as part of a complicated bu
Replying to my own post: after sending this, I read the section in the
documentation about "alias mode". This seems to work fine, and
produces an app that is 50KB instead of nearly 9MB. Since I'm running
this script as part of a complicated build and installation process,
and the path to the inte
