has <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bob wrote:
>
>>>One more question: am I right in thinking that extension binaries
>>>aren't portable between major Python versions, e.g. an .so file
>>>built under Python 2.3 won't work on Python 2.4 and vice-versa?
>>
>>Correct, binary extensions are not portable
This sounds like a good idea to me. The Mathematica editor does this
and I can't remember any problems caused by it.
Jerry
On May 28, 2005, at 5:03 AM, altern wrote:
> hi
>
> maybe a bit late but there it goes.
> I have been doing some Ruby recently and i used the 30 days demo of an
> editor c
