[Pythonmac-SIG] Growl for python 2.5

2007-01-30 Thread Jan Erik Moström
How can I change the growl binding so they work for 2.5? I tried finding some place where I configure this but being a newbie with this I failed. jem ___ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/li

[Pythonmac-SIG] /Library/Graphics/Patch .plugin for Quartz Composer

2007-01-30 Thread Chris McClimans
I was poking around the working Quartz Composer Patch Plugin build I made and found the exact version I used to create it in Contents/ Info.plist: py2app template bundle version 0.2.5 So I downloaded http://svn.red-bean.com/bob/py2app/releases/ py2app-0.2.5/ and it still didn't work. So I st

[Pythonmac-SIG] Regarding universal python framework....

2007-01-30 Thread Christopher Barker
Hi all, I had a question/comment from a numpy/Scipy developer that I was asked to forward on: > > To get the "definition" of "universal" I went to > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Binaries > > > > the last paragraph says: > > Apple's Xcode 2.4 takes the concept of universal binaries ev

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Regarding universal python framework....

2007-01-30 Thread Bob Ippolito
On 1/30/07, Christopher Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I had a question/comment from a numpy/Scipy developer that I was asked > to forward on: > > > > To get the "definition" of "universal" I went to > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Binaries > > > > > > the last paragra

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Regarding universal python framework....

2007-01-30 Thread Christopher Barker
Thanks Bob, We can always count on you for having useful ideas about all sorts of stuff. It does sound like a quad binary wouldn't be a good idea. > For intel it's probably a bit different because there's more registers > and whatnot in 64-bit mode... so it may actually be an overall > performa

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Regarding universal python framework....

2007-01-30 Thread Bob Ippolito
On 1/30/07, Christopher Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Bob, > > We can always count on you for having useful ideas about all sorts of stuff. > > It does sound like a quad binary wouldn't be a good idea. > > > For intel it's probably a bit different because there's more registers > > a