On May 29, 2008, at 5:13 PM, Boyd Waters wrote:
The MacPorts 2.5.2 doesn't have my 64-bit hacks in it.
Are there any changes needed to the python executable binary to
support 64bits? I compiled a quick 64bit python executable as a
companion to the system's Python like so:
gcc -arch x86_
Hello again,
I want to thank everyone for their responses on this issue -- I appreciate
the help! I did get Python 2.3.7 with Tkinter to build on my 10.2 machine
and it was incredibly straightforward. (I forgot to install WASTE, so the
IDE did not build, but that's OK for now).
More comments be
Anthony Kozar wrote:
Hello again,
I want to thank everyone for their responses on this issue -- I appreciate
the help! I did get Python 2.3.7 with Tkinter to build on my 10.2 machine
and it was incredibly straightforward. (I forgot to install WASTE, so the
IDE did not build, but that's OK for
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Anthony Kozar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe there are not many 10.2 users left. But I still frequently hear from
> people who are "just now" giving up their OS 9 machines for something newer.
But that's not really an Apples to Apples comparison, so to speak.
On May 29, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Frank Schima wrote:
I have the latest Mac Pro with 10.5.3. I ran the sys.maxint test
and got the 32-bit result. I tried both the Apple python and the
MacPorts python 2.5.2.
I had a quick look and it seems that the main Python library in the
standard Apple fr
