Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] get an OS X buildbot into the "stable" set

2010-06-22 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 21 Jun, 2010, at 21:17, Bill Janssen wrote: > I just noticed that the list of "stable" Python buildbots don't include > any OS X buildbots. From the web page, the definition of "stable" is > this: > > ``The stable versions are the primary platforms that should always have > all tests passing

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] get an OS X buildbot into the "stable" set

2010-06-22 Thread Shashwat Anand
Ronald: Is there a way we can assist ? On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: > > On 21 Jun, 2010, at 21:17, Bill Janssen wrote: > > > I just noticed that the list of "stable" Python buildbots don't include > > any OS X buildbots. From the web page, the definition of "stable" i

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] get an OS X buildbot into the "stable" set

2010-06-22 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 22 Jun, 2010, at 11:30, Shashwat Anand wrote: > Ronald: Is there a way we can assist ? Sure: look for mac related bugs on the tracker help in making that list smaller. I look for mac related bugs in 3 ways: 1) All issues assigned to the Macintosh component 2) All issues assigned to me (whi

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] get an OS X buildbot into the "stable" set

2010-06-22 Thread Shashwat Anand
Tk is a foreign domain for me :( Beside I do participate in roundup, will increase the frequency after I get over with GSoC. I thought may be I can be of help regarding buildbots ( you mentioned something similar in issue 9048) On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: > > On 22 Jun

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] get an OS X buildbot into the "stable" set

2010-06-22 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 22 Jun, 2010, at 13:34, Shashwat Anand wrote: > Tk is a foreign domain for me :( > Beside I do participate in roundup, will increase the frequency after I get > over with GSoC. > I thought may be I can be of help regarding buildbots ( you mentioned > something similar in issue 9048) I don't

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] get an OS X buildbot into the "stable" set

2010-06-22 Thread Bill Janssen
Ronald Oussoren wrote: > > On 21 Jun, 2010, at 21:17, Bill Janssen wrote: > > > I just noticed that the list of "stable" Python buildbots don't include > > any OS X buildbots. From the web page, the definition of "stable" is > > this: > > > > ``The stable versions are the primary platforms th

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] get an OS X buildbot into the "stable" set

2010-06-22 Thread Bill Janssen
Shashwat Anand wrote: > Tk is a foreign domain for me :( > Beside I do participate in roundup, will increase the frequency after I get > over with GSoC. > I thought may be I can be of help regarding buildbots ( you mentioned > something similar in issue 9048) We could use faster modern Mac build

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] get an OS X buildbot into the "stable" set

2010-06-22 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 22 Jun, 2010, at 18:19, Bill Janssen wrote: > Ronald Oussoren wrote: > >> >> On 21 Jun, 2010, at 21:17, Bill Janssen wrote: >> >>> I just noticed that the list of "stable" Python buildbots don't include >>> any OS X buildbots. From the web page, the definition of "stable" is >>> this: >>>

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] get an OS X buildbot into the "stable" set

2010-06-22 Thread Shashwat Anand
I have Intel machine (2.53 GhZ, 4gb Ram) with Snow Leopard running on it and the system is 'ON' 24x7 with an average uptime of 1 month. I guess I can use mine to run the buildbots. On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Bill Janssen wrote: > Shashwat Anand wrote: > > > Tk is a foreign domain for me :

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] get an OS X buildbot into the "stable" set

2010-06-22 Thread Bill Janssen
Shashwat Anand wrote: > I have Intel machine (2.53 GhZ, 4gb Ram) with Snow Leopard running on > it and the system is 'ON' 24x7 with an average uptime of 1 month. I > guess I can use mine to run the buildbots. That sounds great! Just install the buildbot software (see http://wiki.python.org/moin