On Jun 7, 2005, at 6:50 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> On 7-jun-2005, at 10:59, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> On Jun 7, 2005, at 12:36 AM, Markus Weissmann wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> I think this won't be a big headache for the Python community - not
>>> even for
>>> the whole open source people; i
On 7-jun-2005, at 10:59, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2005, at 12:36 AM, Markus Weissmann wrote:
>
>
>
>> I think this won't be a big headache for the Python community - not
>> even for
>> the whole open source people; in fact - as darwin for x86 already is
>> available
>> for some time now
On Jun 7, 2005, at 7:27 PM, Nick Matsakis wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>
>
>> The OS version number is to specify on which version of Mac OS X the
>> package was built. This matters, because packages will only run on
>> versions of Mac OS X >= this version unless it contain
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Bob Ippolito wrote:
> The OS version number is to specify on which version of Mac OS X the
> package was built. This matters, because packages will only run on
> versions of Mac OS X >= this version unless it contains no
> extensions.
The BundleIdentifier isn't the place for
On Jun 6, 2005, at 8:59 PM, Jon Schull wrote:
> Please forgive the cross-post. I think this is a cross group issue.
>
> I've newly installed Tiger and would like to avoid the dueling
> pythons problem that plagued me with 0SX 10.3. It would be nice to
> be running just one python, but I su
Please forgive the cross-post. I think this is a cross group issue.I've newly installed Tiger and would like to avoid the dueling pythons problem that plagued me with 0SX 10.3. It would be nice to be running just one python, but I suppose that would be asking too much?I installed Bob's MacPython
On Jun 7, 2005, at 5:25 PM, Trent Mick wrote:
> [Larry Meyn wrote]
>
>> Sorry for the wording, a failed attempt at humor.
>>
>
> No worries. Just making sure that ActivePython wasn't doing anything
> stupid. My successful attempt at paranoia. :)
Well, there is the license:
"You may make and giv
On Jun 7, 2005, at 5:23 PM, Trent Mick wrote:
> [Bob Ippolito wrote]
>
>> It'd probably be better off just moving it to /Library/Frameworks/
>> Backup/Python.framework or something, for at least these reasons:
>>
>> If a developer is going to naively embed ActivePython in their
>> application, th
I believe I said I would make a pkg for OS 10.4, not python 2.4.1.
Sorry if I said the later. I am waiting a little while now, since it
seems 0.81 is having tex issues and there may be a version bump here soon.
I could help you through the install you mentioned. Installing each
de
[Larry Meyn wrote]
> Sorry for the wording, a failed attempt at humor.
No worries. Just making sure that ActivePython wasn't doing anything
stupid. My successful attempt at paranoia. :)
Cheers,
Trent
--
Trent Mick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Pythonmac-SIG m
[Bob Ippolito wrote]
> It'd probably be better off just moving it to /Library/Frameworks/
> Backup/Python.framework or something, for at least these reasons:
>
> If a developer is going to naively embed ActivePython in their
> application, they'll probably just add a copy files phase to their
[andrea valle wrote]
> Let's suppose I install ActivePython.
> How do I install other modules? for example NumPy or PIL.
> Is there a particular mechanism doing the dirty job (a job in which I
> tipically don't succeed without package manager...)?
The standard way for 3rd-party modules to do this
On Jun 6, 2005, at 1:10 PM, Nick Matsakis wrote:
> In building packages, bdist_mpkg must pick a name and bundle
> identifier
> for the package, e.g. building appscript results in:
>
> name: appscript-purelib-0.12.0-py2.3-macosx10.3
> bundleIdentifier: org.pythonmac.appscript-purelib-py2.3-macosx
Thanks to everybody for the informative replies!
I'm now trying to decide
my best course of action. The way I see the current situation, there is
Charlie's
standalone installer from IU, but that does not integrate with the pythonmac.org
installation (which currently affects me greatly, because I'
On Jun 7, 2005, at 1:30 PM, Trent Mick wrote:
>> On Jun 7, 2005, at 8:29 AM, Larry Meyn wrote:
>>
>>> There's a new kid in town and he doesn't play nice with MacPython
>>> (but
>>> he does ask first before kicking MacPython aside:)
>>>
>>> Any thoughts on how this affects the Python development
Hi,
trying to install PythonCard on OS X 10.4, but running into an import
problem.
I installed python2.4.1, wxPython2.6, TigerPython24Fix and
TigerPython23Compat from Bob's packages page and added /usr/local/bin
to my path. Python2.4 runs fine and I can import wx fine, but not
pythoncard
All the binaries I provide depend on the system installed python
(i.e. python2.3.x). These binaries are meant for people who want a
one click installer for matplotlib in OSX that includes all needed
dependencies. I would expect more seasoned python users to install
the packages from
Hi and thanks for the porting.
I'm sorry if I'm asking obvious things but I'm just a sort of
programmer.
Let's suppose I install ActivePython.
How do I install other modules? for example NumPy or PIL.
Is there a particular mechanism doing the dirty job (a job in which I
tipically don't succeed wi
Charles Moad wrote:
> I am posting a new 0.81 build with basemap-0.5 right now for Panther.
But does this use python 2.4 ? That wasn't' clear to me from the
download page.
- Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
NOAA/OR&R/HAZMA
Trent,
Sorry for the wording, a failed attempt at humor. I just glanced at
the announcement and noticed that your installer will move macpython
aside, but failed to notice that it adds some symlinks to still access
macpython and there is a mechanism to put it back. It's just that
having two
> On Jun 7, 2005, at 8:29 AM, Larry Meyn wrote:
> > There's a new kid in town and he doesn't play nice with MacPython (but
> > he does ask first before kicking MacPython aside:)
> >
> > Any thoughts on how this affects the Python development ecosystem for
> > OS X? (.. and right on the heels of the
I am posting a new 0.81 build with basemap-0.5 right now for Panther.
The 0.80 misplaced the datafiles, which explains the .matplotlibrc error
you got, Christian. I will make a Tiger build when I get home to my
laptop tonight. The current tiger build should work fine though, only
the pant
Today ActiveState is announcing support for Mac OS X. I'm happy to
announce that ActivePython 2.4.1 for Mac OS X is now available for free
download from:
http://www.ActiveState.com/Products/ActivePython/
This brings the number of free ActivePython platforms to four -- with
the existing Linu
On Jun 7, 2005, at 11:14 AM, Christopher Petrilli wrote:
> On 6/7/05, Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> That's totally not true, though. Basically, almost NONE of the Mac-
>> specific Python stuff works correctly on Mac OS X for Intel, and the
>> changes required to fix that are hard.
On 6/7/05, Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's totally not true, though. Basically, almost NONE of the Mac-
> specific Python stuff works correctly on Mac OS X for Intel, and the
> changes required to fix that are hard.
I'm not that familiar with the specific changes, but from readin
On Jun 7, 2005, at 8:29 AM, Larry Meyn wrote:
> There's a new kid in town and he doesn't play nice with MacPython (but
> he does ask first before kicking MacPython aside:)
>
> Any thoughts on how this affects the Python development ecosystem for
> OS X? (.. and right on the heels of the Intel ann
On Jun 7, 2005, at 12:36 AM, Markus Weissmann wrote:
> I think this won't be a big headache for the Python community - not
> even for
> the whole open source people; in fact - as darwin for x86 already is
> available
> for some time now - we've already tested some software on darwin/x86.
> You ma
There's a new kid in town and he doesn't play nice with MacPython (but
he does ask first before kicking MacPython aside:)
Any thoughts on how this affects the Python development ecosystem for
OS X? (.. and right on the heels of the Intel announcements.)
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/docs/A
Hi Frank,
You might want to check this link: http://sda.iu.edu/projects.html It
provides you with binary installers.
The link was posted in the matplotlib mailing list. I suggested to
announce it for the Pythonmac-SIG as well (hereby done *g*), but got no
reply so far.
Cheers,
Christian
On
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:54:12PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> I'm porting an app to Mac OS X and I need to retrieve the configuration
> values entered in the System Preferences (specifically the HTTP proxy
> settings). I already know how to do that under Gnome and Windows, but I
> haven't found
On Jun 7, 2005, at 5:54, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm porting an app to Mac OS X and I need to retrieve the
> configuration
> values entered in the System Preferences (specifically the HTTP proxy
> settings). I already know how to do that under Gnome and Windows,
> but I
> haven't found
Hi,
I'm porting an app to Mac OS X and I need to retrieve the configuration
values entered in the System Preferences (specifically the HTTP proxy
settings). I already know how to do that under Gnome and Windows, but I
haven't found how to retrieve those values under Mac OS X (Panther, by
the way)
Hi all,
What's the recommended way to install matplotlib on the 2.4.1 framework
build?
I've tried installing the py2.3-macosx.3 version, but that didn't
seem to work.
Do I need to use fink (and leave the nice "official unoffical"
environment behind)? Compile from source? Dependency issues?
A
Hi Enrike,
I think this won't be a big headache for the Python community - not
even for
the whole open source people; in fact - as darwin for x86 already is
available
for some time now - we've already tested some software on darwin/x86.
You may find a list of RPMs I've built in end of 2004 for
34 matches
Mail list logo
