Re: [Pythonocc-users] Python 3.1

2011-01-20 Thread Joel Putnam
Thomas Would this be of any help? http://docs.python.org/library/2to3.html I am not much of a programmer but I am willing to poke away at this over the next few months. Joel On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Paviot wrote: > Joel, > > The move to python 3 is not planned yet. Although S

Re: [Pythonocc-users] Python 3.1

2011-01-20 Thread Thomas Paviot
Joel, The move to python 3 is not planned yet. Although SWIG is able to deal with python3k, the python code we wrote would need a major refactoring (more certainly a 'port' to python3), unless there is some kind of script that can automate the move from 2.x to 3k. Thomas 2011/1/20 Joel Putnam

Re: [Pythonocc-users] Python 3.1

2011-01-20 Thread Joel Putnam
Thomas, yes py2.6 is default but I have installed 3.1 as well. The current Blender 2.56 is build on python 3.1 (packaged internally) I have managed to use the previous version and imported FreeCAD and pythonOCC. I do not currently work with the previous version of blender and as the jump from 2.4

Re: [Pythonocc-users] Python 3.1

2011-01-20 Thread Thomas Paviot
Hi Joel, pythonOCC has been successfully tested for py2.5 and 2.6. I have no hear about any 2.7 attempt. pythonOCC is not compliant with 3.1 changes from the 2.x series. I also use to work with Ubuntu 10.04, with the default python2.6. I didn't know Blender requires 3.1 to be installed. If you ca

[Pythonocc-users] Python 3.1

2011-01-20 Thread Joel Putnam
Hi, I would very much like to build PythonOCC with python 3.1 and have the ability to import it into blender as a way to allow conversion to cad formats other than those available in blender. I am using Ubuntu 10.4, with python 3.1 installed. Is there any instructions out that would aid in accompl