Re: [Pythonocc-users] building pythonocc main with OCE 0.6.0

2011-09-30 Thread Thomas Paviot
GEOM was updated as well. If you don't need GEOM, pass --disable-GEOM to setup.py. Otherwise, you have to rebuild GEOM located in the contrib folder. cmake, make and make install. Thomas 2011/9/30 István Csanády > Hi, > > I am getting the following linker error when I try to bulid the current >

[Pythonocc-users] building pythonocc main with OCE 0.6.0

2011-09-30 Thread István Csanády
Hi, I am getting the following linker error when I try to bulid the current pythonocc with OCE 0.6.0 Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: "GEOM_Object::UnsetMarker()", referenced from: __wrap_GEOM_Object_UnsetMarker in SGEOM_wrap.o "GEOM_Object::GetMarkerTexture()", referenced fro

Re: [Pythonocc-users] now a real bug in garbage collection

2011-09-30 Thread Thomas Paviot
The OCC API changed between 6.3.0 and 6.5.1. As a consequence, pythonocc SWIG files were updated to be consistent with the new API. You need OCC6.5.1 or OCE-0.6.0 to be able to run pythonocc current master. Thomas 2011/9/30 István Csanády > I was going to rebulid pythonocc 0.5 with OCE 0.6.0 to

Re: [Pythonocc-users] now a real bug in garbage collection

2011-09-30 Thread István Csanády
I was going to rebulid pythonocc 0.5 with OCE 0.6.0 to try to check if the code I sent does still crash or not with 0.6.0, but it misses BinLPlugin. Do I have to download the latest pythonocc version to build with OCE? On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Thomas Paviot wrote: > 2011/9/30 D. Barbier

Re: [Pythonocc-users] now a real bug in garbage collection

2011-09-30 Thread Thomas Paviot
2011/9/30 D. Barbier > On 2011/9/30 István Csanády wrote: > > Thanks Thomas, this solved the leaking issue. Any ideas for a workaround > for > > the MMGrOpt crash (when I don't remove gcurve.GetObject())? Or I will > have > > to wait for pyocc 0.6? > > Hello, > > Can you please check whether your

Re: [Pythonocc-users] now a real bug in garbage collection

2011-09-30 Thread István Csanády
Hi Denis, On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:59 AM, D. Barbier wrote: > On 2011/9/30 István Csanády wrote: > > Thanks Thomas, this solved the leaking issue. Any ideas for a workaround > for > > the MMGrOpt crash (when I don't remove gcurve.GetObject())? Or I will > have > > to wait for pyocc 0.6? > > He

Re: [Pythonocc-users] now a real bug in garbage collection

2011-09-30 Thread D. Barbier
On 2011/9/30 István Csanády wrote: > Thanks Thomas, this solved the leaking issue. Any ideas for a workaround for > the MMGrOpt crash (when I don't remove gcurve.GetObject())? Or I will have > to wait for pyocc 0.6? Hello, Can you please check whether your crash happens with OCE 0.6.0? We fixed

Re: [Pythonocc-users] now a real bug in garbage collection

2011-09-30 Thread István Csanády
Thanks Thomas, this solved the leaking issue. Any ideas for a workaround for the MMGrOpt crash (when I don't remove gcurve.GetObject())? Or I will have to wait for pyocc 0.6? Last night I have been profiling some pythonocc code and I have noticed that collect_object is a quite slow even if I remove