I don't won't to be cutting edge, but last stable is from 2011...
I can try taking it from git. If you have a tag for something that is more
stable, I would take that.
Is the procedure to uninstall and then install pythonocc? Or do I need to
start with a clean system?
Sincerely
Michael
On Thu,
> One of the tests that give problems is:
> topology_building_unittest.py
Specifically?
> pythonocc form here:
> https://github.com/tpaviot/pythonocc/archive/master.zip
I really think that's not a good idea --- if you want to live on the cutting
edge ( e.g. master ), you need to be able to upd
Hi,
The s/Stretch/stretch fixed the example.
I still have some troubles with the test.
I moved the unittest library, but it didn't help.
One of the tests that give problems is:
topology_building_unittest.py
I tried pocking around in the test. After math is imported i tried printing
the path, an
I've corrected it through the github editor, its fixed.
-jelle
> There's actually some ongoing refactoring work, the 'Stretch' issue is a
> regression. The fix is in a branch that is not merged yet.
___
Pythonocc-users mailing list
Pythonocc-users@gn
There's actually some ongoing refactoring work, the 'Stretch' issue is a
regression. The fix is in a branch that is not merged yet.
Thomas
2013/12/19 jelle feringa
> It looks like your executing the tests in a strange location: your math
> module is not found for instance.
> Try running the t
It looks like your executing the tests in a strange location: your math module
is not found for instance.
Try running the tests from a different directory ( python is importing a math
module from the current directory, a strange confusion )
Can you please state which release you a running?
Have
I have gotten a bit further.
But I seem to have some troubles. If you can give me any advice, I will
appreciate it
I tried running the src/Examples/Geometry/airfoil.py which fails, I have
attached the output as pyocc_debug.txt
python test_all.py in src/unittest has some errors, I have attached th
> would mean 0.12 or newer :)
i agree this is ambivalent
___
Pythonocc-users mailing list
Pythonocc-users@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
Okay, I will try compiling it from source, I will take it from here:
github.com/tpaviot/oce/releases/tag/OCE-0.12
@Thomas, I did read the INSTALL, I just thought the line:
'OCE 0.12 : the latest oce release.'
would mean 0.12 or newer :)
Just for reference, this is the info on OCE-devel package
y
2013/12/18 Michael Klitgaard
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to getting PythonOCC to compile on CentOS 6.3.
>
> I have installed smesh and OCE through packagas in rpmfusion.org, I also
> took freecad, as it might take in some dependencies.
>
> freecad-0.13-4.el6
> freecad-doc-0.13-4.el6
> smesh-5.1.2.2-8.sv
Hi Michael,
PythonOCC requires OCE 0.12 rather than 0.14
-jelle
___
Pythonocc-users mailing list
Pythonocc-users@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
Hi,
I'm trying to getting PythonOCC to compile on CentOS 6.3.
I have installed smesh and OCE through packagas in rpmfusion.org, I also
took freecad, as it might take in some dependencies.
freecad-0.13-4.el6
freecad-doc-0.13-4.el6
smesh-5.1.2.2-8.svn55.el6
smesh-devel-5.1.2.2-8.svn55.el6
smesh-do
12 matches
Mail list logo
