Dear Thomas,
I am sorry if my last e-mail gave the feeling that I was suggesting the
integration of every possible engineering tool in pythonOCC.
I do not know all the details of the OCC library and I was thinking, because
this project about assembly sequence is presented on the OCC website, that
Very nice, works perfectly!
Henrik Rudstrom
On 24 February 2010 17:53, Thomas Paviot wrote:
> I compiled the latest opende revision from the subversion repository. Idem
> for pyode. I didn't tell the configure scripts to use 64 bits.
>
> Thomas
>
> 2010/2/24 Henrik Rudstrom
>
> Looks like re
I compiled the latest opende revision from the subversion repository. Idem
for pyode. I didn't tell the configure scripts to use 64 bits.
Thomas
2010/2/24 Henrik Rudstrom
> Looks like really good fun!
> just one question, how did you compile ode/pyode?
> tried the macports version, but it threw
Dear Pierre,
First, rigid body simulation and assembly sequencing are, according to me,
really different topics in term of objectives and expected outputs (the
slideshow attached is quite old, one of my colleague presented a more recent
paper related to this topic at the MOSIM'08 conference)
The
Looks like really good fun!
just one question, how did you compile ode/pyode?
tried the macports version, but it threw me segmentation errors and a lot of
these: "inertia must be positive definite in dMassCheck() File mass.cpp"
Tried compiling manually, but i can't get the configure script to under
Dear Thomas,
Following you mail concerning rigid body simulation, I wanted to mention a
work illustrated on the OpenCascade website concerning modelling of assembly
and that may be related to rigid body simulation most notably in the
"detection of contacts" topics.
Here is the link of the documen
> I also tried the ctypes solution. It's almost impossible to achieve in a
> 'blind' mode, i.e. without having the official documentation of the API
> (impossible may be exaggerated, I mean I was not able to achieve it!). On the
> other hand, this way to proceed is reverse engineering: if you ev
2010/2/21 Bryan Bishop
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Thomas Paviot wrote:
> > A few years ago, I developed a software aimed at providing rigid body
> > simulation features to Catia V5 or SolidWorks. This project, known as
> > "Decade dynamics", is not active anymore although many users are
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Thomas Paviot wrote:
> A few years ago, I developed a software aimed at providing rigid body
> simulation features to Catia V5 or SolidWorks. This project, known as
> "Decade dynamics", is not active anymore although many users are frequently
> asking for new featu
Dear all,
A few years ago, I developed a software aimed at providing rigid body
simulation features to Catia V5 or SolidWorks. This project, known as
"Decade dynamics", is not active anymore although many users are frequently
asking for new features or bugfixes (for your information, a website
ded
10 matches
Mail list logo
