>
> Gosh, I should have checked the git repositories before diving into
> modifying the PythonOCC-0.5 SWIG interfaces. Well, at least
> I learned a lot during that week ;-).
>
Your a very fast learner...
> - I think the gccxml issue I am having on my Mac really is related to my
> gccxml version
Hi Jelle and Thomas,
thanks for pointing me to the OCEworkflow document.
My SMESH / GEOM modifications are following along the line of what Fotis
Soutis did (Corba stuff removed), with working NETGEN and Tetgen mesher
Plugins.
I am going to contact Fotis Soutis about my modifications to see
2012/8/17 Mark Blome
>
> Hi Thomas, hi Jelle,
>
Hi Mark,
>
> thanks for your comments and hints.
>
> About the GEOM and SMESH modules: I started all over again creating
> stand-alone versions of SMESH and GEOM from the Salome V6.5.0 sources cause
> I
> judged that updating these projects file
>
> There were issues with hashes before the overloading of the python
> __hash__ method with the HashCode OCCT method (which is now a static
> function). This has been solved some time ago.
> There's already a unittest for hash (see TestList here
> https://github.com/tpaviot/pythonocc/blob/master/
2012/8/17 jelle feringa
> I think (but I'm not sure), that removing the __hash__ method introduces
>> some regression.
>>
>
> A solid test for __hash__ is critical. One needs to be able to compare
> TopoDS_* instances for example, and I recall having some issues in the past
> with the hashes.
> A
>
> I think (but I'm not sure), that removing the __hash__ method introduces
> some regression.
>
A solid test for __hash__ is critical. One needs to be able to compare
TopoDS_* instances for example, and I recall having some issues in the past
with the hashes.
Anyway, comparing TopoDS_* can be so
hi Mark,
> thanks for your comments and hints.
>
Its exciting to have you onboard =)
> About the GEOM and SMESH modules: I started all over again creating
> stand-alone versions of SMESH and GEOM from the Salome V6.5.0 sources cause
> I
> judged that updating these projects file by file would
Hi Thomas, hi Jelle,
thanks for your comments and hints.
About the GEOM and SMESH modules: I started all over again creating stand-alone
versions of SMESH and GEOM from the Salome V6.5.0 sources cause I
judged that updating these projects file by file would have been too
cumbersome. Well, pr
2012/8/15 Mark Blome
>
> Hi Jelle,
>
Hi Mark,
Thank you for your post. It's not that usual that people here contribute to
the low level SWIG layer.
> thanks for your quick reply. At our institute (Zuse Institute Berlin,
> www.zib.de) we have developed a FEM solver specialized for nano-optics,
Hi Jelle,
thanks for your quick reply. At our institute (Zuse Institute Berlin,
www.zib.de) we have developed a FEM solver specialized for nano-optics, which
is being
commercialized by the startup-company JCMWave (www.jcmwave.com). In my
research I am simulating functional nano-structures (e
Dear Mark,
I am developing a CAD & Meshing application for finite element simulations
> (computational nano-optics) using PythonOCC.
>
Interesting!
I take it that your developing a custom solver?
Cool to see PythonOCC in such a sophisticated project, exciting.
> I very much enjoy the rapid soft
11 matches
Mail list logo
