Re: [Pythonocc-users] Very basic question about PythonOCC

2010-11-10 Thread Jelle Feringa
Hi Jeffrey,

So you're into CFD simulations? PythonOCC and Code Saturne can be easily 
coupled, perhaps that's of interest. Here's a post on how FEM meshing and 
setting boundary conditions can be done on the BREP topology. Note that 
PythonOCC is oriented toward nurbs and is not a suitable tool for dealing with 
meshes.

-jelle___
Pythonocc-users mailing list
Pythonocc-users@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users


Re: [Pythonocc-users] Very basic question about PythonOCC

2010-11-09 Thread Thomas Paviot
Hi Jeffrey,

pythonOCC is suitable for your purpose. It's such a huge API that it's not
possible to develop an example for all possible study cases, but from all
the examples provided with the library, you can easily import a STL file,
explore the topology/geometry of the shape and then write whatever data to
whatever output file.

These examples can be browsed at :
http://code.google.com/p/pythonocc/source/browse/#svn/trunk/src/examples.
Best Regards,

Thomas

2010/11/10 Jeffrey E. McAninch 

>
> I am building a Python/Fortran 95 based simulation environment for some
> physics simulations.
>
> I am interested in reading a Solidworks model (ported for instance to STL)
> and querying xyz locations
> to populate a simulation mesh, which I will then write out as a NETCDF
> database, which will be the
> input to my simulation code.
>
> Is PythonOCC a good environment for doing this?  The examples on the
> website seem to be
> mostly about building and manipulationg a 3D model from python, rather than
> querying an
> existing model.
>
> Any suggestions/comments appreciated.
>
>
> –
> Jeffrey E. McAninch
>
> j...@emc2fusion.com
> work: 505-471-2050
> cell: 505-412-5050
>
>
> ___
> Pythonocc-users mailing list
> Pythonocc-users@gna.org
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
>
___
Pythonocc-users mailing list
Pythonocc-users@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users