I not like that change. If someone want to use both versions, renameit and use..
I think that PyUSB 1.0 must be called stable (I use and not have problemsof
the library).
Another problem: only PyUSB 0.4 is packaged. Who is the packager?
From: wander.lair...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013
2013/1/26 Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com:
I not like that change. If someone want to use both versions, rename
it and use..
I think that PyUSB 1.0 must be called stable (I use and not have problems
of the library).
Another problem: only PyUSB 0.4 is packaged. Who is the
From: Wander Lairson Costa wander.lair...@gmail.com
This patch fixes issue 8 (python 3.3 compatibilty). Unfortunatelly, it will
not include all bytes of an Unicode string (see comments in the issue).
I would like it to be reviewed before applying to master.
Wander Lairson Costa (1):
Fix: keep
What about this?
Tested in python 2.7 and 3.3
a = array.array(B)
s=uabcꬦ
try:
a.fromstring(s.encode('ascii'))
except UnicodeEncodeError:
a.fromstring(s.encode('utf8'))
print(a)
array('B', [97, 98, 99, 234, 172, 166])
a = array.array(B)
s=abc
try:
a.fromstring(s.encode('ascii'))
I not like that change. If someone want to use both versions, rename
it and use..
I agree: who many installations would be broken once pyusb is updated?
All Python modules that depends on pyusb would have to be updated,
this is not a trivial task.
My two cents,
Manu.
