2010/7/15 Chris Wolf :
>
>
> On 7/15/10 6:13 AM, Wander Lairson wrote:
>> 2010/7/15 Chris Wolf :
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/12/10 9:49 AM, Wander Lairson wrote:
Yes, I haven't started OpenUSB, I just "typed" the code but never
tested it. I will apply your fix so at least we can enumerate devices
>>
On 7/15/10 6:13 AM, Wander Lairson wrote:
> 2010/7/15 Chris Wolf :
>>
>>
>> On 7/12/10 9:49 AM, Wander Lairson wrote:
>>> Yes, I haven't started OpenUSB, I just "typed" the code but never
>>> tested it. I will apply your fix so at least we can enumerate devices
>>> using OpenUSB. Thanks a lot.
>>
2010/7/15 Chris Wolf :
>
>
> On 7/12/10 9:49 AM, Wander Lairson wrote:
>> Yes, I haven't started OpenUSB, I just "typed" the code but never
>> tested it. I will apply your fix so at least we can enumerate devices
>> using OpenUSB. Thanks a lot.
>>
>
> Sure, thank *you*. So shall I assume that the
On 7/12/10 9:49 AM, Wander Lairson wrote:
> Yes, I haven't started OpenUSB, I just "typed" the code but never
> tested it. I will apply your fix so at least we can enumerate devices
> using OpenUSB. Thanks a lot.
>
Sure, thank *you*. So shall I assume that the libusb10 backend is the best
sup
On 7/12/10 10:20 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Wander Lairson
> wrote:
>> As much more people use libusb instead of OpenUSB (probably because
>> OpenUSB is an younger library), I postponed it in favor of making the
>> libusb backend stable. I hope getting libusb rea
On 7/12/10 10:15 AM, Wander Lairson wrote:
> As much more people use libusb instead of OpenUSB (probably because
> OpenUSB is an younger library), I postponed it in favor of making the
> libusb backend stable. I hope getting libusb reasonably stable and
> start the heavy development of OpenUSB.
>
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Wander Lairson
wrote:
> As much more people use libusb instead of OpenUSB (probably because
> OpenUSB is an younger library), I postponed it in favor of making the
> libusb backend stable. I hope getting libusb reasonably stable and
> start the heavy development o
As much more people use libusb instead of OpenUSB (probably because
OpenUSB is an younger library), I postponed it in favor of making the
libusb backend stable. I hope getting libusb reasonably stable and
start the heavy development of OpenUSB.
2010/7/12 Chris Wolf :
>
>
> On 7/12/10 9:00 AM, Chri
On 7/12/10 9:00 AM, Chris Wolf wrote:
> Wander,
>
> Earlier, I mentioned that the openusb backend did not work for me on
> MacOS, but I'm pretty sure I found the problem. There seems to be a
> typo in backend/openusb.py on line #155, where it configures the return
> type for the function "openu
Yes, I haven't started OpenUSB, I just "typed" the code but never
tested it. I will apply your fix so at least we can enumerate devices
using OpenUSB. Thanks a lot.
2010/7/12 Chris Wolf :
> Wander,
>
> Earlier, I mentioned that the openusb backend did not work for me on
> MacOS, but I'm pretty sur
Wander,
Earlier, I mentioned that the openusb backend did not work for me on
MacOS, but I'm pretty sure I found the problem. There seems to be a
typo in backend/openusb.py on line #155, where it configures the return
type for the function "openusb_init" - this line refers to the function
as "open
11 matches
Mail list logo
