Dalba added a comment.
In T183864#3881882, @Xqt wrote:
There is one minor point to keep the copyright year (but it doesn't has to do with the copyright itself): There are various methods to download the framework files and keep them up-to-date. One can use svn or git repository or nightly dump
Xqt added a comment.
@Dvorapa: it is T87409TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T183864EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: XqtCc: Legoktm, gerritbot, Dvorapa, Ryan10145, eflyjason, zhuyifei1999, jayvdb, Ladsgroup, Xqt, rafidaslam,
Legoktm added a project: Software-Licensing.Legoktm added a comment.
I -2'd the patch, while well intentioned, I don't think it's a good idea. IANAL, (but I think I have a decent understanding of software copyright laws and problems).
The year is usually included due to
gerritbot added a project: Patch-For-Review.
TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T183864EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: gerritbotCc: gerritbot, Dvorapa, Ryan10145, eflyjason, zhuyifei1999, jayvdb, Ladsgroup, Xqt, rafidaslam, Aklapper,
Framawiki removed a project: Google-Code-in-2017.Framawiki added a comment.
In T183864#3873062, @Dvorapa wrote:
What next? Create a new task to remove years from scripts and close this one in favor of that? Or change the subject of this task in order not to dissipate this discussion?
First
