Tacsipacsi added a comment.
This document has “Phabricator” in its title, and no other product name. It
seems pretty obvious for me that it therefore applies to all projects tracked
on Phabricator. Pywikibot can ignore it of course, but don’t be surprised if
people still follow its
Dvorapa added a comment.
Does Pywikibot team have to follow this? We usually prioritize tasks by
triaging them by priority. We could have High, Medium, Low and Lowest columns
on Pywikibot dashboard I suppose, but this is much easier.
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T72249
Tacsipacsi added a comment.
In
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Project_management#Priority_levels:
> High – Someone is working or planning to work on this task soon.
I don’t think this is the case here.
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T72249
EMAIL
MarcoAurelio added a comment.
Hello. Was already a path for this task decided? Best regards.TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T72249EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: MarcoAurelioCc: Bencemac, Legoktm, valhallasw, Xqt, Dvorapa, Mpaa,
Tacsipacsi added a comment.
If this task will mean that any local config replaces the defaults (which seems very likely for me), than not: most talk pages have the algo parameter set, which would override this setting. Maybe we shouldn’t store the config, but simply pass it using a command line
Tacsipacsi added a comment.
The current huwiki system takes {{függőben}} into account on every talk page; I think this system should be kept (by storing a wiki default in the archivebot config).
@binbot The current code takes also “inactive” positions into account. (I don’t know whether it’s good
whym added a comment.
In T72249#4114632, @binbot wrote:
some delay may be neccessary and should be implemented (we don't want people to mark sections as done at 2:00 am and the bot to archive them at 3:00 am before anybody could have seen the changes). I think it So "algo = old(30d) OR
binbot added a comment.
Please consider that
{{done}} or any similar template may have parameters (at least |)
some delay may be neccessary and should be implemented (we don't want people to mark sections as done at 2:00 am and the bot to archive it at 3:00 am before anybody could have seen
whym added a comment.
I added some details into the description which might help people implement this idea.TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T72249EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: whymCc: Legoktm, valhallasw, Xqt, Dvorapa, Mpaa,
MarcoAurelio added a comment.
This will be useful for noticeboards that records requests that ought not be archived until it have been actioned. That is, do not archive this section until {{done}} or {{not done}} is there. I wonder if we can raise the priority on this one or have another group of
Mpaa added a comment.
@Tacsipacsi, you can submit a patch.
Ideally, the template should be generic and configurable somehow.TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T72249EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: MpaaCc: Mpaa, Tacsipacsi, binbot,
Tacsipacsi added a comment.
The modified Hungarian script's code is available on Tool Labs: https://tools.wmflabs.org/ato/archivebot_hu.py.txtTASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T72249EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: TacsipacsiCc:
binbot added a comment.
Hungarian Wikipedia uses this template to prevent the section being archived even if expired:
https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sablon:F%C3%BCgg%C5%91ben
It may have a parameter.
Currently we use an individual workaround for that, but we woluld like to do this with the
13 matches
Mail list logo
