Thanks Peter. We'll test it this week and let you know of any issues we
come across.
On 19 October 2014 23:07, Peter Bigot wrote:
> It's out, on SourceForge and PyPI.
>
> Best news: the PyPI version should work with Python 2.6 through 3.4.2;
> turns out it wasn't all that hard to make the genera
It's out, on SourceForge and PyPI.
Best news: the PyPI version should work with Python 2.6 through 3.4.2;
turns out it wasn't all that hard to make the generated bindings
cross-compatible. AFAICT it works just fine within the limitations of each
Python version (though I did not test Python 3.0 be
Hi Peter,
We've been using 1.2.4-DEV in production on Python 3 (currently 3.4.1)
since that branch was created and announced on the mailing list. We've
found it to be stable and reliable - we've got roughly 200'000 lines of
code (mixed Java JAXB and Python PyXB), and about 4700 lines of XML schema
There is no planned release date; it's whenever I get tired of working
on other things and turn attention to PyXB. 1.2.5 is more likely than
1.3.0, and python3 will be part of 1.3.0. The hold-up there is that
PyXB includes generated bindings for a large number of schema, and at
this time I don't
Hi,
I'm a maintainer of PyXB package in Fedora and I'm really looking
forward to PyXB 1.2.4 (or 1.3.0?) release with official Python 3
support. I would like to ask if there is any ETA on when it could be
officially released.
Thanks and regards
Michal
--
