Re: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure

- Original Message - > From: "Tim Flink" > To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 5:21:16 PM > Subject: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure > > This came up in the qadevel meeting today and I wanted to put a bit > more detail

Enabling running Taskotron tasks on Koji scratch builds

Hi team, we have received a few requests to run tasks on koji scratch builds. Unfortunately, it is not as straightforward as it would seem since "real" koji builds and scratch builds are not treated the same. That's why "real" builds are downloaded with "koji download-build" and scratch builds

Re: Enabling "new koji build" Taskotron checks on scratch builds

- Original Message - > From: "Jeremy Cline" > To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 8:07:55 PM > Subject: Enabling "new koji build" Taskotron checks on scratch builds > > Hi everyone, > > I recently started maintaining

Re: Getting error "Try #1 for call None (multiCall) failed: syntax error: line 1" while running locally abicheck task

- Original Message - > From: "Sinny Kumari" > To: "Fedora QA Development" > Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 1:15:43 PM > Subject: Getting error "Try #1 for call None (multiCall) failed: syntax > error: line 1" while running locally

Re: Please Test Staging Phabricator

- Original Message - > From: "Tim Flink" > To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 4:56:11 PM > Subject: Re: Please Test Staging Phabricator > > On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 04:09:24 -0500 (EST) > Kamil Paral wrote: > > > >

Re: ResultsDB 2.0 - DB migration on DEV

- Original Message - > From: "Kamil Paral" > To: "Fedora QA Development" > Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 2:58:03 PM > Subject: Re: ResultsDB 2.0 - DB migration on DEV > > > > > So, I have performed the migration on DEV - there

Re: 2016-09-14 @ 14:00 UTC - QA Tools Video "Standup" Meeting

- Original Message - > From: "Tim Flink" > To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 4:59:49 PM > Subject: Re: 2016-09-14 @ 14:00 UTC - QA Tools Video "Standup" Meeting > > > > One of the topics that came up was how often to do these

Task Result Namespaces

Hi, we have deployed task result namespaces support a while ago and put our checks (depcheck, upgradepath, rpmlint) into the 'qa' namespace. With newly added tasks like task-abicheck and task-dockerautotest, we weren't sure where to put them and so we used the scratch namespace which is supposed

Re: Renamed task-libabigail to task-abicheck and wiki page available

- Original Message - > From: "Sinny Kumari" > To: "Fedora QA Development" > Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 11:18:42 AM > Subject: Renamed task-libabigail to task-abicheck and wiki page available > > Hi, > > We felt that task-abicheck name

Re: Packaging for Fedora

- Original Message - > From: "Tim Flink" > To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 1:53:56 AM > Subject: Packaging for Fedora > > After a bit of miscommunication, I think we're finally on the same page > as Infra in terms of getting QA tools

Re: 2015-07-27 @ 14:00 UTC - Fedora QA Devel Meeting

Finally gave up fixing mysterious network issues which prevents me to stay at the channel for more than minute, posting my status report here, sorry about that: #topic mkrizek status report #info preparing for Flock #info wrote a draft blogpost about upcoming artifacts changes #info trivial

Re: Coding Style

- Original Message - From: Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 8:49:53 AM Subject: Coding Style Back to everyone's favorite topic - coding style and enforcement of that style. I'm not picking on Josef here - I'm sure I've

Re: Fedmsg Emitting

- Original Message - From: Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 1:14:56 AM Subject: Re: Fedmsg Emitting On Thu, 14 May 2015 20:02:29 +0200 Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com wrote: Before we start sending fedmsgs we need

Re: To RHEL or Not to RHEL?

- Original Message - From: Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2015 8:05:04 PM Subject: To RHEL or Not to RHEL? ...snip... While virt-in-virt is possible, I'd prefer to avoid the extra complexity and performance penalty and figure

Re: CI for Taskotron and Related Projects

- Original Message - From: Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com To: Fedora QA Development qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 3:38:41 PM Subject: Re: CI for Taskotron and Related Projects I've just re-started the CI on qadevel (the future one, not cloud) that

disposable-develop branch

There is a new branch disposable-develop [1]. The branch will serve as develop branch for disposable clients work. Having separate develop branch for disposable clients work will allow us doing releases in the meantime. When sending patches for review, do not forget to pass branch name to 'arc

Taskotron Fedmsgs Format

Please find proposed format for taskotron fedmsgs below. { 'i': 1, 'msg': {'check': {'name': 'upgradepath',                      'type': 'bodhi_update',                       'item': 'wireshark-1.10.12-1.fc20',                      'arch': 'x86_64'},   'packages': [{'nvr':

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora QA Devel Meeting (Cancelled)

- Original Message - From: Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, September 8, 2014 4:05:49 PM Subject: Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora QA Devel Meeting (Cancelled) On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 07:26:39 -0600 Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:

Re: Default invocation of pytest for qadevel projects

- Original Message - From: Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2014 3:29:32 PM Subject: Re: Default invocation of pytest for qadevel projects On Thu, 6 Mar 2014 05:44:15 -0500 (EST) Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote: For

Re: Review Request 61: Rename line.png to line-bottom.png

been discarded. Review request for blockerbugs. Repository: blockerbugs Description --- It appears that we've been getting GET /static/img/line-bottom.png HTTP/1.1 404 for quite some time now... commit fb18e118d108a8965a2ea8a2087bf1baa88cc193 Author: Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com Date

Re: Review Request 62: Fix needinfo field length

/1dfd879c7637_fix_needinfo_field_l.py PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/62/diff/ Testing --- Testing done on my dev machine. Thanks, Martin Krizek ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: Review Request 64: Do not display obsolete and deleted updates

3525501c382f21339dab0e18e973141ad29073e3 Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/64/diff/ Testing --- Unit test attached in the patch. Some testing done on my dev machine as well. Thanks, Martin Krizek ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: Review Request 37: Fix sequences in alembic

been discarded. Review request for blockerbugs. Repository: blockerbugs Description --- commit abf5fe2abbcfbce45d103864f5ba40fc89f233fa Author: Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com Date: Tue Jul 16 13:57:28 2013 +0200 Fix sequences in alembic Sequences need to be created

phab: auth providers

I wonder if we should enable authentication through providers like GitHub instead of just username/password (and FAS in the future). This would make it easier for non-fas users to report bugs or contribute to the project. I also noticed that anonymous access to view tickets is possible but one

Re: phab: auth providers

Link might be helpful: http://www.phabricator.com/docs/phabricator/article/Configuring_Accounts_and_Registration.html - Original Message - From: Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com To: Fedora QA Development qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 3:01:21 PM

[Maniphest] [Created] T29: show also closed bugs

mkrizek created this task. mkrizek added a subscriber: mkrizek. mkrizek added a project: blockerbugs TASK DESCRIPTION Moved from trac [[ https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/440 | https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/440 ]]: I would like to be able to see also closed blocker

[Maniphest] [Created] T30: Improve documentation

mkrizek created this task. mkrizek added a subscriber: mkrizek. mkrizek added a project: blockerbugs TASK DESCRIPTION Moved from trac [[ https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/384 | https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/384 ]]: Problem At the moment, our documentation is out of date

Review Request 62: Fix needinfo field length

-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/62/diff/ Testing --- Testing done on my dev machine. Thanks, Martin Krizek ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

[Maniphest] [Claimed] T25: Allow users to see which bugs have changed blocker status in the last X hours/days

mkrizek claimed this task. mkrizek added a comment. I have come up with a proposal implementation here: [[https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/blockerbugs.git/commit/?h=feature/T25-blocker-statusid=7b6bed052566341626745dea5b3601b43442c48a | 7b6bed052566341626745dea5b3601b43442c48a]]

[Maniphest] [Closed] T26: Display all users that are listed in needinfo flag

mkrizek closed this task as Resolved. mkrizek added a comment. Fixed in develop [[ https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/blockerbugs.git/commit/?h=developid=0618ae3bc89431f9d00a3cc103b19fc0376697ed | 0618ae3bc89431f9d00a3cc103b19fc0376697ed ]] TASK DETAIL

Re: Review Request 57: Multiple builds fixing a bug show confusing status label

--- On Dec. 10, 2013, 3:54 p.m., Martin Krizek wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/57

Re: Review Request 57: Multiple builds fixing a bug show confusing status label

to show the newer update Martin Krizek wrote: But wouldn't the older update be marked as obsolete? Tim Flink wrote: It should be but for example, if you look at the tracking app right now, there are 2 anaconda/blivet updates - one of which has been deleted in bodhi but still shows

Review Request 57: Multiple builds fixing a bug show confusing status label

/fedora-qa/ticket/438 Repository: blockerbugs Description --- commit 911781af9cc06e27c0a8580f07f7673c90e7329d Author: Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com Date: Tue Dec 10 16:28:52 2013 +0100 Sort updates by (status.desc(), pending.desc()) This way an update label is correctly

Re: Review Request 57: Multiple builds fixing a bug show confusing status label

. Bugs: 438 https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/438 Repository: blockerbugs Description (updated) --- commit 911781af9cc06e27c0a8580f07f7673c90e7329d Author: Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com Date: Tue Dec 10 16:28:52 2013 +0100 Sort updates by (status.desc(), pending.desc

Re: Review Request 56: Serve IRC Format page as text/plain

marked as submitted. Review request for blockerbugs. Bugs: 428 https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/428 Repository: blockerbugs Description --- commit ea3d4374710be7ee6762072746bddbdb7aa85716 Author: Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com Date: Thu Oct 17 11:10:57 2013 +0200

Review Request 56: Serve IRC Format page as text/plain

/fedora-qa/ticket/428 Repository: blockerbugs Description --- commit ea3d4374710be7ee6762072746bddbdb7aa85716 Author: Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com Date: Thu Oct 17 11:10:57 2013 +0200 Serve IRC Format page as text/plain Fixes: #428 Diffs - blockerbugs

Re: Review Request 55: milestone_info uses hardcoded bugzilla url instead of using config value

marked as submitted. Review request for blockerbugs. Bugs: t423 https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/t423 Repository: blockerbugs Description --- commit ddcd87dcda42b9ee17000cdac0251b0b3a7f3e28 Author: Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com Date: Fri Oct 11 12:49:54 2013 +0200

Re: Review Request 53: fix sync so that closed bugs don't remain on the buglist

at https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/blockerbugs.git/commit/?h=hotfix/t421-closedsyncfailureid=e37129e7a5c119d43ac296a09d0f7ff9e8d42795, it looks good to me. - Martin Krizek On Oct. 10, 2013, 4:10 p.m., Tim Flink wrote

Re: Review Request 53: fix sync so that closed bugs don't remain on the buglist

On Oct. 11, 2013, 7:54 a.m., Martin Krizek wrote: The diff doesn't seem right :) However, looking at https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/blockerbugs.git/commit/?h=hotfix/t421-closedsyncfailureid=e37129e7a5c119d43ac296a09d0f7ff9e8d42795, it looks good to me. https://git.fedorahosted.org

Review Request 55: milestone_info uses hardcoded bugzilla url instead of using config value

://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/t423 Repository: blockerbugs Description --- commit ddcd87dcda42b9ee17000cdac0251b0b3a7f3e28 Author: Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com Date: Fri Oct 11 12:49:54 2013 +0200 Don't use hardcoded bz url in the milestone_info template Diffs - blockerbugs

Re: Review Request 45: Improve asset management

On Sept. 24, 2013, 3:44 p.m., Tim Flink wrote: I attempted to test this on an el6 machine, got a traceback when doing sync. tb added to trac ticket Martin Krizek wrote: Yeah, python-webassets needs to be installed, it's missing in Requires (and in epel repo, it's present

Re: Review Request 45: Improve asset management

On Sept. 24, 2013, 3:44 p.m., Tim Flink wrote: I attempted to test this on an el6 machine, got a traceback when doing sync. tb added to trac ticket Martin Krizek wrote: Yeah, python-webassets needs to be installed, it's missing in Requires (and in epel repo, it's present

Re: Review Request 45: Improve asset management

-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/45/#review100 --- On Aug. 29, 2013, 10:23 a.m., Martin Krizek wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail

Re: Review Request 44: Update URLs should contain the update ID when possible

been marked as submitted. Review request for blockerbugs. Bugs: 386 https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/386 Repository: blockerbugs Description --- commit be73d7514172ad122ec969b74a1bac37f14f28f4 Author: Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com Date: Mon Aug 12 14:52:39 2013 +0200

Re: Review Request 42: Indicate bugs that are needinfo

://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/42/#review99 --- On Aug. 29, 2013, 10:25 a.m., Martin Krizek wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard

Re: Review Request 52: Clean leftovers missed in reviews

a41627485a77daecc07c8d33f41dc5a17e2ebb97 blockerbugs/cli.py 7151337aa1e16e571d0cf165c87c3c6f50276b90 Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/52/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Martin Krizek ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: Review Request 52: Clean leftovers missed in reviews

This is just unused variable. - Martin Krizek On Sept. 13, 2013, 11:08 a.m., Martin Krizek wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/52

Re: Review Request 52: Clean leftovers missed in reviews

-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/52/#review96 --- On Sept. 13, 2013, 11:08 a.m., Martin Krizek wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com

Review Request 52: Clean leftovers missed in reviews

-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/52/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Martin Krizek ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

Review Request 51: irc list sort order doesn't match html buglist

/fedora-qa/ticket/416 Repository: blockerbugs Description --- commit 7462ba2ac917381e0f1430fdf4421293fe26ddeb Author: Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com Date: Wed Sep 11 14:34:56 2013 +0200 Sort irc and bug lists in the same order Fixes: #416 Diffs - blockerbugs

Re: Review Request 46: New admin interface and builds support

On Aug. 23, 2013, 12:59 p.m., Martin Krizek wrote: blockerbugs/models/build.py, line 19 http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/46/diff/3/?file=936#file936line19 I wonder if these strings should be limited in length. Ilgiz Islamgulov wrote: you're right Could you include

Re: Review Request 45: Improve asset management

: blockerbugs Description --- commit d86f88d7f9da899ffef44ad617a8a831327b7d80 Author: Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com Date: Mon Aug 12 16:40:16 2013 +0200 Improve asset management Fixes: #357 I have not minified two js files in milestone_stats.html template as I am not sure it's

Re: Review Request 42: Indicate bugs that are needinfo

--- Run db sync, one of the bugs had needinfo flag set, everything worked as expected. Thanks, Martin Krizek ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

Re: Review Request 46: New admin interface and builds support

arguments (1 given) - Martin Krizek On Aug. 22, 2013, 7:01 p.m., Ilgiz Islamgulov wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/46

Re: Review Request 46: New admin interface and builds support

-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/46/#comment124 I wonder if these strings should be limited in length. - Martin Krizek On Aug. 22, 2013, 7:01 p.m., Ilgiz Islamgulov wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard

Re: Review Request 42: Indicate bugs that are needinfo

095cf7294a5b0a5b3fb9979abf9e669e4acd157c alembic/versions/23cc8daafea8_add_needinfo_to_bug.py PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/42/diff/ Testing --- Run db sync, one of the bugs had needinfo flag set, everything worked as expected. Thanks, Martin Krizek

Re: Review Request 42: Indicate bugs that are needinfo

--- On Aug. 8, 2013, 11:33 a.m., Martin Krizek wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/42

Re: Review Request 44: Update URLs should contain the update ID when possible

--- On Aug. 12, 2013, 12:57 p.m., Martin Krizek wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/44

Re: Review Request 45: Improve asset management

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/45/#review65 --- On Aug. 12, 2013, 2:46 p.m., Martin Krizek wrote

Review Request 44: Update URLs should contain the update ID when possible

/fedora-qa/ticket/386 Repository: blockerbugs Description --- commit be73d7514172ad122ec969b74a1bac37f14f28f4 Author: Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com Date: Mon Aug 12 14:52:39 2013 +0200 Update URLs should comtain the update ID when possible Fixes: #386 Diffs

Re: Review Request 31: Display flash messages in appropriate place

/templates/layout.html 28c22872b716d7125880710db53881a73bc8cdc8 Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/31/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Martin Krizek ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review Request 23: Bugzilla Faults During Proposal are not logged, lead to http 500 errors

/ Testing --- Thanks, Martin Krizek ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

Re: Review Request 24: Logo in Upper Left Corner Should be a Link to Main Index

been marked as submitted. Review request for blockerbugs. Bugs: 369 https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/369 Repository: blockerbugs Description --- commit 06b3fc725ad3e219b1ef09aa56abe0152932ce05 Author: Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com Date: Wed Apr 24 13:01:58 2013 +0200

Review Request 21: Milestone Update List Generates HTTP 500 Error

/fedora-qa/ticket/382 Repository: blockerbugs Description --- commit 9df9a31b61b4e952a0bb5f5c1c56dc62ac9923a6 Author: Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com Date: Mon Apr 22 09:50:32 2013 +0200 Replace NTH with FE in the rest of places. commit 39cef0d8cfe416ed401174c8c4a5a51b3ca0af2d

Re: Review Request 20: Rework Logging Mechanisms

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/20/#review23 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Martin Krizek On April 18, 2013, 3:03

Review Request 19: Rework Logging Mechanisms

2806ca0abb2fefd29505677e76fcf240149dc380 blockerbugs/cli.py 833e27585e427d4ee24f01fc5355469ce07d92ce blockerbugs/__init__.py 7809b1fc216c764512403acb45e9e0dd836d07de blockerbugs.spec 3f3e9567b60e2f2482cdbfbab267a2aa47f3feb5 Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/19/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Martin Krizek

Re: Review Request 17: Implement Bugzilla Account Association

/controllers/main.py ce26c641b9db05f11510f16177b017a56cf757c2 blockerbugs/controllers/forms.py b213c055d9297b59c6cf5d83358dcd14e265e345 alembic/versions/1d12b74d12bd_add_userinfo_table.py PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/17/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Martin Krizek