Re: Packaging for Fedora

2016-05-03 Thread Tim Flink
On Mon, 2 May 2016 17:53:56 -0600 Tim Flink wrote: > I've requested a qadevel-sig (the '-sig' part is required) group in > pkgdb [2] to manage ACLs for the packages and be the default assignee > in bugzilla so we don't have to worry about who's the primary POC. The pkgdb group request was proc

Re: Packaging for Fedora

2016-05-03 Thread Martin Krizek
- Original Message - > From: "Tim Flink" > To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 1:53:56 AM > Subject: Packaging for Fedora > > After a bit of miscommunication, I think we're finally on the same page > as Infra in terms of

Packaging for Fedora

2016-05-02 Thread Tim Flink
After a bit of miscommunication, I think we're finally on the same page as Infra in terms of getting QA tools packaged. I've made a commitment to have everything packaged in Fedora before F25. In return, they've agreed to let us continue to update the infra repo with non-koji-built RPMs until that