On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:53:50 +0100
Tim Flink wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:27:09 +0100
> Dan Horák wrote:
>
> > Hi Tim,
> >
> > I'm replying to your questions from December.
> >
> > yes, the secondary arches follow the same process as primary, they
> > have blocker bugs, etc. Also accepted
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:27:09 +0100
Dan Horák wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> I'm replying to your questions from December.
>
> yes, the secondary arches follow the same process as primary, they
> have blocker bugs, etc. Also accepted blockers in secondary should be
> promoted to Exceptions in primary, it
Hi Tim,
I'm replying to your questions from December.
yes, the secondary arches follow the same process as primary, they have
blocker bugs, etc. Also accepted blockers in secondary should be
promoted to Exceptions in primary, it would be nice to have such
"button" in the app for secondaries, but
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 10:44:24 +0100
Normand wrote:
> Hi there,
> I used the blockerbugs application at
> https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/propose_bug but found that
> this is restricted to the primary arch releases.
Yeah, it wasn't really designed to handle releases on multiple arches.
>
