Re: openQA live image testing: ready for merge?

2015-03-14 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 08:34 -0400, Josef Skladanka wrote: == openqa_trigger.py == I really don't like the whole check_condition() thing. The name of the function does no correspond to what it does, which is quite unpleasant together with its side-effects (scheduling the jobs, and changing

Re: openQA live image testing: ready for merge?

2015-03-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 07:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On 2015-03-12 02:50, Josef Skladanka wrote: Adam, please set these up for review in Phabricator. I strongly suspect (given the time that I spent looking at the changes so far) that some discussion will be required, and Phab is

Re: openQA live image testing: ready for merge?

2015-03-12 Thread Josef Skladanka
Adam, please set these up for review in Phabricator. I strongly suspect (given the time that I spent looking at the changes so far) that some discussion will be required, and Phab is _the_ place to do it. Also, please make sure to rebase your repos to their current state, before creating the

Re: openQA live image testing: ready for merge?

2015-03-12 Thread Josef Skladanka
Some preliminary feedback: = openqa_fedora = == _do_install_and_reboot.pm == Please delete the anaconda_install_finish needle, if it is unused. anaconda_install_done needle: * Why is only a part of the button selected? * What is the logic behind assert_and_click for multiple areas in one

Re: openQA live image testing: ready for merge?

2015-03-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On 2015-03-12 02:50, Josef Skladanka wrote: Adam, please set these up for review in Phabricator. I strongly suspect (given the time that I spent looking at the changes so far) that some discussion will be required, and Phab is _the_ place to do it. Also, please make sure to rebase your repos to

openQA live image testing: ready for merge?

2015-03-11 Thread Adam Williamson
Hey, folks. So I've been tweaking and testing my openQA live image test stuff today, and I think it's probably about ready for merging. I've got branches of both openqa_fedora and openqa_fedora_tools with relevant changes: https://www.happyassassin.net/cgit/openqa_fedora/log/?h=live