> Proposal looks good to me, I don't have any strong objections.
> 1. If you don't like blame: UNIVERSE, why not use blame: TESTBENCH?
> 2. I think that having enum values in details in crash structure would be
> better, but I don't have strong opinion either way.
For consistency checking, yes.
> With ResultsDB and Trigger rewrite done, I'd like to get started on ExecDB.
> The current ExecDB is more of a tech-preview, that was to show that it's
> possible to consume the push notifications from Buildbot. The thing is, that
> the code doing it is quite a mess (mostly because the
Proposal looks good to me, I don't have any strong objections.
1. If you don't like blame: UNIVERSE, why not use blame: TESTBENCH?
2. I think that having enum values in details in crash structure would be
better, but I don't have strong opinion either way.
Jan
