> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Kamil Paral < kpa...@redhat.com > wrote:
> > > Proposal looks good to me, I don't have any strong objections.
> >
>
> > > 1. If you don't like blame: UNIVERSE, why not use blame: TESTBENCH?
> >
>
> > > 2. I think that having enum values in details in crash
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Proposal looks good to me, I don't have any strong objections.
>
> 1. If you don't like blame: UNIVERSE, why not use blame: TESTBENCH?
> 2. I think that having enum values in details in crash structure would be
> better,