Re: [Qbs] QtC 4.10.1 missed QBS 1.14.1!!

2019-10-08 Thread Ola Røer Thorsen
It looks like at least some fixes were included, as I'm able to build with Qt 5.13.1 now (which was impossible with Qt Creator 4.10.0). But I've got no idea exactly which commits were included either. Maybe it's just the version bump commit that is missing? Ola tir. 8. okt. 2019 kl. 21:39 skrev

[Qbs] QtC 4.10.1 missed QBS 1.14.1!!

2019-10-08 Thread Denis Shienkov
Hi guys, Seems, you are forgot to deliver QBS 1.14.1 with QtC 4.10.1. Right now I see that it use QBS 1.14.0. How it happens? I was hoping for QBS 1.14.1... All my fixes go to /dev/ass    :(( BR, Denis ___ Qbs mailing list Qbs@qt-project.org

Re: [Qbs] avoid RPATH pointing to Qt installation folder

2019-10-08 Thread Heiko Nardmann
Am 08.10.19 um 12:00 schrieb Christian Kandeler: > On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 11:39:09 +0200 > Heiko Nardmann wrote: > >> The question is whether to include Qt.core.libPath (as defined inside >> core.qbs) into the list of rpaths. If I put it into the list then it >> also is part of the binaries RPATH -

Re: [Qbs] avoid RPATH pointing to Qt installation folder

2019-10-08 Thread Heiko Nardmann
Am 08.10.19 um 10:51 schrieb Christian Kandeler: > On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 09:53:32 +0200 > Heiko Nardmann wrote: > >> I'm looking for a way to prevent the RPATH of an executable pointing to >> the installed Qt. From the "core.qbs" file I see that cpp.rpaths is set >> to libPath for Linux by default.

[Qbs] avoid RPATH pointing to Qt installation folder

2019-10-08 Thread Heiko Nardmann
Hi together, I'm looking for a way to prevent the RPATH of an executable pointing to the installed Qt. From the "core.qbs" file I see that cpp.rpaths is set to libPath for Linux by default. So ... do I have to change this file "core.qbs"??? The RPATH shall point to the Qt that I deploy together