Re: [Qbs] Qt doc, qtmain and qbs

On 28/11/2017 12:16 PM, Jake Petroules wrote: Shouldn't qbs be in the build tools list too, eg: "If you do not use qmake, qbs or other build tools such as CMake" Is it worth creating a Qt ticket (and a change request)? Is so, are you happy with the above phrasing? Yes, and yes. For the

Re: [Qbs] Qt doc, qtmain and qbs

> On Nov 27, 2017, at 1:22 PM, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > Hi there, > > I was looking at the usage of the qtmain static library (on Windows), i > wasn't aware of this, so i looked up the Qt documentation and it says: > > qtmain is a helper library that enables the

[Qbs] Qt doc, qtmain and qbs

Hi there, I was looking at the usage of the qtmain static library (on Windows), i wasn't aware of this, so i looked up the Qt documentation and it says: qtmain is a helper library that enables the developer to write a cross-platform main() function on Windows. If you do not use qmake or

[Qbs] building for iOS

>> I would also like to discuss following features that could be added to qbs: >> 2. Reproducing Apple framework bundle structure for iOS. > This is largely already in place. What specific issues are you running into? If I understand correctly, option bundle.isShallow allows to reproduce