23.07.2020 14:34, Christian Kandeler пишет:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 14:13:13 +0300
Карелин Павел wrote:
Having weighed all the "pros" and "cons", I have decided not to use
qbs.Process in outputArtifacts. Now I settled on a stupidly-simple
solution: I reduced the number of generated files from 6
On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 14:13:13 +0300
Карелин Павел wrote:
> Having weighed all the "pros" and "cons", I have decided not to use
> qbs.Process in outputArtifacts. Now I settled on a stupidly-simple
> solution: I reduced the number of generated files from 6 to 5.
But how do you know there will ne
Having weighed all the "pros" and "cons", I have decided not to use
qbs.Process in outputArtifacts. Now I settled on a stupidly-simple
solution: I reduced the number of generated files from 6 to 5. The
increase in compilation time in the assembly scale of a large project is
almost imperceptible
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:32:10 +0300
Карелин Павел wrote:
> How can I execute Command from outputArtifacts?
You can't, you need to use a JavaScript command and qbs.Process.
Christian
___
Qbs mailing list
Qbs@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/
21.07.2020 16:45, Christian Kandeler пишет:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 15:10:38 +0300
Карелин Павел wrote:
I recently needed to develop a rule for a sip generator (see below).
Basically, the rule works well, but yesterday it failed. At the output,
sip-generator create 6 cpp-files of the following f
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 15:10:38 +0300
Карелин Павел wrote:
> I recently needed to develop a rule for a sip generator (see below).
> Basically, the rule works well, but yesterday it failed. At the output,
> sip-generator create 6 cpp-files of the following format:
> sip_corepartX.cpp (this is just
> However, yesterday I came across a small
> sip-file, and the generated cpp-files turned out to be not 6, but only 5.
> Naturally, my rule failed.
>
> Question: how can I resolve my situation?
> Of course, I can tell the sip-generator to create fewer cpp-files (parameter
> -j), but I would like t