On 30 July 2015 at 19:41, John Snow wrote:
> Peter: I assume you still want this for 2.4 to fix the clang warnings, yes?
Yeah, it's safe enough. (I don't actually require these clang
warnings all fixed for 2.4; but it's a nice-to-have.)
thanks
-- PMM
Peter: I assume you still want this for 2.4 to fix the clang warnings, yes?
On 07/21/2015 02:02 PM, John Snow wrote:
> There are likely others that could be updated, but we'll
> go with a light touch for 2.4 for now.
>
> Without the Unsigned specifier, this shifts bits into the
> signed bit, whic
On 30/07/2015 03:35, Fam Zheng wrote:
> block.cbdrv_create
> block/curl.c curl_init_state
> block/io.c bdrv_drain
> block/io.c bdrv_drain_all
> block/io.c bdrv_prwv_co
> block/io.c bdrv_get_block_status_above
> block/io.c
Am 27.07.2015 um 16:30 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
I was experimenting a little with optimized zlib versions (like zlib-ng) to
optimize the speed of compressed qcow2 generation.
I found out that chaning the windowBits from -12 to -15 alone incr
