On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 08:28:20PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> Am 24.02.2016 um 14:40 schrieb Jeff Cody:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 02:07:18PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >> Am 24.02.2016 um 13:44 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben:
> >>> if the size is forced I would set the chs values to max. this
From: Paolo Bonzini
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng
Acked-by: Stefan Hajnoczi
---
From: Paolo Bonzini
In disabled mode, virtio-blk dataplane seems to be enabled, but flow
actually goes through the normal virtio path. This patch simplifies a bit
the handling of disabled mode. In disabled mode, virtio_blk_handle_output
might be called even if s->dataplane
From: Paolo Bonzini
Make the API more similar to the regular virtqueue API. This will
help when modifying the code to not use vring.c anymore.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
Signed-off-by: Michael S.
From: Paolo Bonzini
This is needed because dataplane will run during block migration as well.
The block device migration code is quite liberal in taking the iothread
mutex. For simplicity, keep it the same way, even though one could
actually choose between the BQL (for
Am 24.02.2016 um 14:07 schrieb Kevin Wolf:
> Am 24.02.2016 um 13:44 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben:
>> if the size is forced I would set the chs values to max. this way no
>> new creator String is needed and it is even backwards compatible. this
>> is what disk2vhd does.
> Does disk2vhd do it this
Am 24.02.2016 um 14:40 schrieb Jeff Cody:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 02:07:18PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 24.02.2016 um 13:44 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben:
>>> if the size is forced I would set the chs values to max. this way no
>>> new creator String is needed and it is even backwards
Am 24.02.2016 um 18:50 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 23.02.2016 18:16, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > This patch adds an option to the drive_add HMP command to create only a
> > BlockDriverState without a BlockBackend on top.
> >
> > The motivation for this is that libvirt needs to specify options to a
Am 24.02.2016 um 18:54 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 23.02.2016 18:16, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Now that we can use drive_add to create new nodes without a BB, we also
> > want to be able to delete such nodes again.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf
> > ---
> > blockdev.c | 9
On 23.02.2016 18:16, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Now that we can use drive_add to create new nodes without a BB, we also
> want to be able to delete such nodes again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf
> ---
> blockdev.c | 9 +
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git
On 23.02.2016 18:16, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> This patch adds an option to the drive_add HMP command to create only a
> BlockDriverState without a BlockBackend on top.
>
> The motivation for this is that libvirt needs to specify options to a
> migration target (specifically, detect-zeroes).
On 02/23/2016 05:52 PM, John Snow wrote:
> "Couldn't determine the cluster size of the target image, which has no
> backing file" is more correct. The problem is not why we couldn't
> determine it, but instead that we were unable to AND there is no backing
> file, so our inability to determine it
Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody
---
tests/qemu-iotests/146 | 52 ++
tests/qemu-iotests/146.out | 32
2 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/146 b/tests/qemu-iotests/146
index
Changes from v2:
Patches 2,4: Just use qemu-io instead of a qemu instance (thanks Kevin, Max)
Patch 3: Use "qem2" for the creator app field, when forcing the size (thanks
Kevin)
This is a long-standing issue that has come up many times, and has had
several different patches posted to fix it.
This tests auto-detection, and overrides, of VHD image sizes created
by Virtual PC and Hyper-V.
This adds two sample images:
hyperv2012r2-dynamic.vhd.bz2 - dynamic VHD image created with Hyper-V
virtualpc-dynamic.vhd.bz2- dynamic VHD image created with Virtual PC
Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody
When QEMU creates a VHD image, it goes by the original spec,
calculating the current_size based on the nearest CHS geometry (with an
exception for disks > 127GB).
Apparently, Azure will only allow images that are sized to the nearest
MB, and the current_size as calculated from CHS cannot
The VHD file format is used by both Virtual PC, and Hyper-V. However,
how the virtual disk size is calculated varies between the two.
Virtual PC uses the CHS drive parameters to determine the drive size.
Hyper-V, on the other hand, uses the current_size field in the footer
when determining image
On 24.02.2016 16:40, Jeff Cody wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:23:29AM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 24.02.2016 um 01:47 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
>>> This tests auto-detection, and overrides, of VHD image sizes created
>>> by Virtual PC and Hyper-V.
>>>
>>> This adds two sample images:
>>>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 04:44:21PM +0100, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 24.02.2016 16:40, Jeff Cody wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:23:29AM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >> Am 24.02.2016 um 01:47 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
> >>> This tests auto-detection, and overrides, of VHD image sizes created
> >>>
On 24.02.2016 16:40, Jeff Cody wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:23:29AM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 24.02.2016 um 01:47 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
>>> This tests auto-detection, and overrides, of VHD image sizes created
>>> by Virtual PC and Hyper-V.
>>>
>>> This adds two sample images:
>>>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:23:29AM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 24.02.2016 um 01:47 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
> > This tests auto-detection, and overrides, of VHD image sizes created
> > by Virtual PC and Hyper-V.
> >
> > This adds two sample images:
> >
> > hyperv2012r2-dynamic.vhd.bz2 -
On 24.02.2016 10:28, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Max Reitz writes:
>
>> On 23.02.2016 10:48, Markus Armbruster wrote:
[...]
>>> Can you explain the *actual* difference between blk_backends and
>>> monitor_block_backends? "Actual" in the sense of difference in contents
>>>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 02:07:18PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 24.02.2016 um 13:44 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben:
> > if the size is forced I would set the chs values to max. this way no
> > new creator String is needed and it is even backwards compatible. this
> > is what disk2vhd does.
>
>
if the size is forced I would set the chs values to max. this way no new
creator String is needed and it is even backwards compatible. this is what
disk2vhd does.
Peter
> Am 24.02.2016 um 13:24 schrieb Jeff Cody :
>
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:19:37AM +0100, Kevin Wolf
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:19:37AM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 24.02.2016 um 01:47 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
> > When QEMU creates a VHD image, it goes by the original spec,
> > calculating the current_size based on the nearest CHS geometry (with an
> > exception for disks > 127GB).
> >
> >
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:23:29AM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 24.02.2016 um 01:47 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
> > This tests auto-detection, and overrides, of VHD image sizes created
> > by Virtual PC and Hyper-V.
> >
> > This adds two sample images:
> >
> > hyperv2012r2-dynamic.vhd.bz2 -
Am 24.02.2016 um 01:47 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
> This tests auto-detection, and overrides, of VHD image sizes created
> by Virtual PC and Hyper-V.
>
> This adds two sample images:
>
> hyperv2012r2-dynamic.vhd.bz2 - dynamic VHD image created with Hyper-V
> virtualpc-dynamic.vhd.bz2-
Am 24.02.2016 um 01:47 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
> When QEMU creates a VHD image, it goes by the original spec,
> calculating the current_size based on the nearest CHS geometry (with an
> exception for disks > 127GB).
>
> Apparently, Azure will only allow images that are sized to the nearest
>
Am 24.02.2016 um 10:28 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> Max Reitz writes:
>
> > On 23.02.2016 10:48, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Max Reitz writes:
> >>
> >>> On 22.02.2016 09:24, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Max Reitz writes:
>
Max Reitz writes:
> On 23.02.2016 10:48, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Max Reitz writes:
>>
>>> On 22.02.2016 09:24, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Max Reitz writes:
> On 17.02.2016 17:20, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 17.02.2016 um
30 matches
Mail list logo