* Alberto Garcia (be...@igalia.com) wrote:
> On Wed 30 Mar 2016 05:07:15 PM CEST, Max Reitz wrote:
> >> I also have another (not directly related) question: why not simply
> >> use the node name when removing children? I understood that the idea
> >> was that it's possible to have the same node
On Wed 30 Mar 2016 05:07:15 PM CEST, Max Reitz wrote:
>> I also have another (not directly related) question: why not simply
>> use the node name when removing children? I understood that the idea
>> was that it's possible to have the same node attached twice to the
>> same Quorum, but can you
On 30 March 2016 at 21:52, Jeff Cody wrote:
> The following changes since commit 9370a3bbc478f623dd21d783560629ea2064625b:
>
> Update version for v2.6.0-rc0 release (2016-03-30 19:25:40 +0100)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 08:07:17PM +0100, Max Reitz wrote:
> As I responded to:
> - http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg04464.html
> - http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg05680.html
>
> I think a general solution for querying the block node tree would