From: Akinobu Mita
QEMU would not start when trying to create two UFS host controllers and
a UFS logical unit for each with the following options:
-device ufs,id=bus0 \
-device ufs-lu,drive=drive1,bus=bus0,lun=0 \
-device ufs,id=bus1 \
-device ufs-lu,drive=drive2,bus=bus1,lun=0 \
This is
From: Jeuk Kim
The following changes since commit 1664d74c50739401c8b40e8b514d12b5fc250067:
tests/avocado: Update yamon-bin-02.22.zip URL (2023-12-04 08:17:35 -0500)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://gitlab.com/jeuk20.kim/qemu.git tags/pull-ufs-20231205
for you to fetch
Hi Philippe,
Thank you for informing me.
I want this issue is fixed for the 8.2 release.
I created an issue like you said, but I couldn't assign the milestone (I'm
guessing it's a permission problem).
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2018
Could you help me with this?
Regardless,
On 4/12/23 16:05, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> QEMU would not start when trying to create two UFS host controllers and
> a UFS logical unit for each with the following options:
>
> -device ufs,id=bus0 \
> -device ufs-lu,drive=drive1,bus=bus0,lun=0 \
> -device ufs,id=bus1 \
> -device
Hi Jeuk,
On 4/12/23 17:50, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 4/12/23 16:05, Akinobu Mita wrote:
QEMU would not start when trying to create two UFS host controllers and
a UFS logical unit for each with the following options:
-device ufs,id=bus0 \
-device ufs-lu,drive=drive1,bus=bus0,lun=0 \
On 4/12/23 16:05, Akinobu Mita wrote:
QEMU would not start when trying to create two UFS host controllers and
a UFS logical unit for each with the following options:
-device ufs,id=bus0 \
-device ufs-lu,drive=drive1,bus=bus0,lun=0 \
-device ufs,id=bus1 \
-device
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 01:23:09PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 29.11.2023 um 20:55 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > The AioContext lock no longer has any effect. Remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi
> > ---
> > include/hw/virtio/virtio-scsi.h | 14 --
> >
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 03:31:37PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 02:55:46PM -0500, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > This is the big patch that removes
> > aio_context_acquire()/aio_context_release() from the block layer and
> > affected block layer users.
> >
> > There isn't a
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 03:33:57PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 29.11.2023 um 20:55 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > This is the big patch that removes
> > aio_context_acquire()/aio_context_release() from the block layer and
> > affected block layer users.
> >
> > There isn't a clean way to
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 01:46:13PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 29.11.2023 um 20:55 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > Protect the Task Management Function BH state with a lock. The TMF BH
> > runs in the main loop thread. An IOThread might process a TMF at the
> > same time as the TMF BH is
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 09:25:52AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 02:55:42PM -0500, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > Protect the Task Management Function BH state with a lock. The TMF BH
> > runs in the main loop thread. An IOThread might process a TMF at the
> > same time as the TMF
Am 29.11.2023 um 20:55 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> This is the big patch that removes
> aio_context_acquire()/aio_context_release() from the block layer and
> affected block layer users.
>
> There isn't a clean way to split this patch and the reviewers are likely
> the same group of
On 2023/12/02 17:08, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
On 2023/12/02 17:00, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
Introduction
This series is based on the RFC series submitted by Yui Washizu[1].
See also [2] for the context.
This series enables SR-IOV emulation for virtio-net. It is useful
to test SR-IOV
Am 29.11.2023 um 20:55 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> Stop acquiring/releasing the AioContext lock in
> bdrv_graph_wrlock()/bdrv_graph_unlock() since the lock no longer has any
> effect.
>
> The distinction between bdrv_graph_wrunlock() and
> bdrv_graph_wrunlock_ctx() becomes meaningless and
Am 29.11.2023 um 20:55 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> aio_context_acquire()/aio_context_release() has been replaced by
> fine-grained locking to protect state shared by multiple threads. The
> AioContext lock still plays the role of balancing locking in
> AIO_WAIT_WHILE() and many functions in
Am 29.11.2023 um 20:55 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> The aio_context_acquire() API is being removed. Drop the test case that
> calls the API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf
Am 29.11.2023 um 20:55 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> Protect the Task Management Function BH state with a lock. The TMF BH
> runs in the main loop thread. An IOThread might process a TMF at the
> same time as the TMF BH is running. Therefore tmf_bh_list and tmf_bh
> must be protected by a
Am 29.11.2023 um 20:55 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> Protect the Task Management Function BH state with a lock. The TMF BH
> runs in the main loop thread. An IOThread might process a TMF at the
> same time as the TMF BH is running. Therefore tmf_bh_list and tmf_bh
> must be protected by a
Am 29.11.2023 um 20:55 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> The AioContext lock no longer has any effect. Remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi
> ---
> include/hw/virtio/virtio-scsi.h | 14 --
> hw/scsi/scsi-bus.c | 2 --
> hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c | 28
19 matches
Mail list logo
