Re: [PULL 0/1] ufs queue

2024-05-01 Thread Richard Henderson
On 4/28/24 20:25, Jeuk Kim wrote: From: Jeuk Kim The following changes since commit fd87be1dada5672f877e03c2ca8504458292c479: Merge tag 'accel-20240426' ofhttps://github.com/philmd/qemu into staging (2024-04-26 15:28:13 -0700) are available in the Git repository at: https://gitlab.com

Re: [PATCH-for-9.1 v2 2/3] migration: Remove RDMA protocol handling

2024-05-01 Thread Peter Xu
On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 04:59:38PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 11:31:13AM -0400, Peter Xu wrote: > > What I worry more is whether this is really what we want to keep rdma in > > qemu, and that's also why I was trying to request for some serious > > performance measure

Re: [PATCH-for-9.1 v2 2/3] migration: Remove RDMA protocol handling

2024-05-01 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 11:31:13AM -0400, Peter Xu wrote: > What I worry more is whether this is really what we want to keep rdma in > qemu, and that's also why I was trying to request for some serious > performance measurements comparing rdma v.s. nics. And here when I said > "we" I mean both QEM

Re: [PATCH-for-9.1 v2 2/3] migration: Remove RDMA protocol handling

2024-05-01 Thread Peter Xu
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 09:00:49AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 09:15:03AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > > Peter Xu writes: > > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 08:08:10AM -0500, Michael Galaxy wrote: > > >> Hi All (and Peter), > > > > > > Hi, Michael, > > > > > >>

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] hw/nvme: Support SR-IOV VFs more than 127

2024-05-01 Thread Klaus Jensen
On Apr 1 04:30, Minwoo Im wrote: > From: Minwoo Im > > The number of virtual functions(VFs) supported in SR-IOV is 64k as per > spec. To test a large number of MSI-X vectors mapping to CPU matrix in > the QEMU system, we need much more than 127 VFs. This patch made > support for 256 VFs per a

Re: [PATCH] hw/nvme: Add support for setting the MQES for the NVMe emulation

2024-05-01 Thread Klaus Jensen
On May 1 12:27, Berg, John wrote: > On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 15:01 +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote: > > On Apr  4 13:04, John Berg wrote: > > > From: John Berg > > > > > > The MQES field in the CAP register describes the Maximum Queue > > > Entries > > > Supported for the IO queues of an NVMe controller.

Re: [PATCH] hw/nvme: Add support for setting the MQES for the NVMe emulation

2024-05-01 Thread Berg, John
On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 15:01 +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote: > On Apr  4 13:04, John Berg wrote: > > From: John Berg > > > > The MQES field in the CAP register describes the Maximum Queue > > Entries > > Supported for the IO queues of an NVMe controller. Adding a +1 to > > the > > value in this field r

Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] qapi: introduce device-sync-config

2024-05-01 Thread Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
On 30.04.24 11:31, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: On 30.04.24 11:19, Markus Armbruster wrote: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes: Add command to sync config from vhost-user backend to the device. It may be helpful when VHOST_USER_SLAVE_CONFIG_CHANGE_MSG failed or not triggered interrupt