On 03.06.21 18:02, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Mon, 3 May 2021 at 10:55, Max Reitz wrote:
In the bdrv_snapshot_goto() fallback code, we work with a pointer to
either bs->file or bs->backing. We close that child, close the node
(with .bdrv_close()), apply the snapshot on the child node, and then
On Mon, 3 May 2021 at 10:55, Max Reitz wrote:
>
> In the bdrv_snapshot_goto() fallback code, we work with a pointer to
> either bs->file or bs->backing. We close that child, close the node
> (with .bdrv_close()), apply the snapshot on the child node, and then
> re-open the node (with
05.05.2021 23:37, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
05.05.2021 19:25, Max Reitz wrote:
On 05.05.21 17:05, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
03.05.2021 12:54, Max Reitz wrote:
In the bdrv_snapshot_goto() fallback code, we work with a pointer to
either bs->file or bs->backing.
We close
05.05.2021 19:25, Max Reitz wrote:
On 05.05.21 17:05, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
03.05.2021 12:54, Max Reitz wrote:
In the bdrv_snapshot_goto() fallback code, we work with a pointer to
either bs->file or bs->backing.
We close that child,
Do we?
We *detach it.
close the node
On 05.05.21 17:05, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
03.05.2021 12:54, Max Reitz wrote:
In the bdrv_snapshot_goto() fallback code, we work with a pointer to
either bs->file or bs->backing.
We close that child,
Do we?
We *detach it.
close the node
(with .bdrv_close()), apply the
03.05.2021 12:54, Max Reitz wrote:
In the bdrv_snapshot_goto() fallback code, we work with a pointer to
either bs->file or bs->backing.
We close that child,
Do we?
close the node
(with .bdrv_close()), apply the snapshot on the child node, and then
re-open the node (with .bdrv_open()).
In the bdrv_snapshot_goto() fallback code, we work with a pointer to
either bs->file or bs->backing. We close that child, close the node
(with .bdrv_close()), apply the snapshot on the child node, and then
re-open the node (with .bdrv_open()).
In order for .bdrv_open() to attach the same child
