On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 12:58:24PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2025, 12:54 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 04:26:42PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> > > RFC: Should I squash the last two backport patches? One technically
> > > introduces a regression which bre
Hi, this series aims to support Python 3.14; a large part of how it
achieves this is by backporting various changes that have been made to
the python-qemu-qmp standalone library to ensure that our in-tree
version is very nearly byte identical to the standalone version.
Several of Dan's patches are
On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 04:26:42PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> RFC: Should I squash the last two backport patches? One technically
> introduces a regression which breaks our "no regressions in series"
> rule, but makes the per-patch relationship murkier. Please let me know.
What is the effect of the
On Tue, Sep 2, 2025, 12:54 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 04:26:42PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> > RFC: Should I squash the last two backport patches? One technically
> > introduces a regression which breaks our "no regressions in series"
> > rule, but makes the per-patch re
