Re: [PATCH 01/12] i386/xen: fix per-vCPU upcall vector for Xen emulation

2023-10-24 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2023-10-24 at 13:16 +0100, Paul Durrant wrote: > On 16/10/2023 16:18, David Woodhouse wrote: > > From: David Woodhouse > > > > The per-vCPU upcall vector support had two problems. Firstly it was > > using the wrong hypercall argument and would always return -EFAULT. > > And secondly it

Re: [PATCH 01/12] i386/xen: fix per-vCPU upcall vector for Xen emulation

2023-10-24 Thread Paul Durrant
On 16/10/2023 16:18, David Woodhouse wrote: From: David Woodhouse The per-vCPU upcall vector support had two problems. Firstly it was using the wrong hypercall argument and would always return -EFAULT. And secondly it was using the wrong ioctl() to pass the vector to the kernel and thus the

[PATCH 01/12] i386/xen: fix per-vCPU upcall vector for Xen emulation

2023-10-16 Thread David Woodhouse
From: David Woodhouse The per-vCPU upcall vector support had two problems. Firstly it was using the wrong hypercall argument and would always return -EFAULT. And secondly it was using the wrong ioctl() to pass the vector to the kernel and thus the *kernel* would always return -EINVAL. Linux