* Daniel P. Berrangé (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> This makes the field name align with the newly introduced method
> names in the previous commit.
I think that's the method in the following commits?
tbh I'm not sure about this; 'pos' is still passed to writev_buffer
and get_buffer to say where
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 10:51:27AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Daniel P. Berrangé (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > This makes the field name align with the newly introduced method
> > names in the previous commit.
>
> I think that's the method in the following commits?
Opps, yeah, I
* Daniel P. Berrangé (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 10:51:27AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Daniel P. Berrangé (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > This makes the field name align with the newly introduced method
> > > names in the previous commit.
> >
> > I thi
This makes the field name align with the newly introduced method
names in the previous commit.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé
---
migration/qemu-file.c | 19 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/migration/qemu-file.c b/migration/qemu-file.c
index
