On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 4:12 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
>
> Am 24.08.21 um 22:39 schrieb Ilya Dryomov:
> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:38 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
> >> Am 22.08.21 um 23:02 schrieb Ilya Dryomov:
> >>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 3:41 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> the qemu rbd driver
Am 24.08.21 um 22:39 schrieb Ilya Dryomov:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:38 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
Am 22.08.21 um 23:02 schrieb Ilya Dryomov:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 3:41 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
the qemu rbd driver currently lacks support for bdrv_co_block_status.
This results mainly in
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:38 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
>
> Am 22.08.21 um 23:02 schrieb Ilya Dryomov:
> > On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 3:41 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> >> the qemu rbd driver currently lacks support for bdrv_co_block_status.
> >> This results mainly in incorrect progress during block
Am 22.08.21 um 23:02 schrieb Ilya Dryomov:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 3:41 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
the qemu rbd driver currently lacks support for bdrv_co_block_status.
This results mainly in incorrect progress during block operations (e.g.
qemu-img convert with an rbd image as source).
This
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 3:41 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
>
> the qemu rbd driver currently lacks support for bdrv_co_block_status.
> This results mainly in incorrect progress during block operations (e.g.
> qemu-img convert with an rbd image as source).
>
> This patch utilizes the rbd_diff_iterate2
the qemu rbd driver currently lacks support for bdrv_co_block_status.
This results mainly in incorrect progress during block operations (e.g.
qemu-img convert with an rbd image as source).
This patch utilizes the rbd_diff_iterate2 call from librbd to detect
allocated and unallocated (all zero
