On 20.01.21 07:09, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
19.01.2021 23:21, Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/26/20 12:17 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Experiments show, that copy_range is not always making things faster.
So, to make experimentation simpler, let's add a parameter. Some more
perf
19.01.2021 23:21, Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/26/20 12:17 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Experiments show, that copy_range is not always making things faster.
So, to make experimentation simpler, let's add a parameter. Some more
perf parameters will be added soon, so here is a new struct.
On 10/26/20 12:17 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Experiments show, that copy_range is not always making things faster.
> So, to make experimentation simpler, let's add a parameter. Some more
> perf parameters will be added soon, so here is a new struct.
>
> For now, add new backup qmp
On 26.10.20 18:17, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Experiments show, that copy_range is not always making things faster.
So, to make experimentation simpler, let's add a parameter. Some more
perf parameters will be added soon, so here is a new struct.
For now, add new backup qmp parameter
Experiments show, that copy_range is not always making things faster.
So, to make experimentation simpler, let's add a parameter. Some more
perf parameters will be added soon, so here is a new struct.
For now, add new backup qmp parameter with x- prefix for the following
reasons:
- We are going
