It doesn't matter if it was the user or the class itself that specified
where the sockfile should be created; the fact is that if we are using a
sockfile here, we created it and we can clean it up.

Signed-off-by: John Snow <js...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Willian Rampazzo <willi...@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20211118204620.1897674-3-js...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: John Snow <js...@redhat.com>
---
 python/qemu/machine/machine.py | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/python/qemu/machine/machine.py b/python/qemu/machine/machine.py
index b1dd77b538..ea9e07805d 100644
--- a/python/qemu/machine/machine.py
+++ b/python/qemu/machine/machine.py
@@ -141,12 +141,10 @@ def __init__(self,
 
         if monitor_address is not None:
             self._monitor_address = monitor_address
-            self._remove_monitor_sockfile = False
         else:
             self._monitor_address = os.path.join(
                 self.sock_dir, f"{self._name}-monitor.sock"
             )
-            self._remove_monitor_sockfile = True
 
         self._console_log_path = console_log
         if self._console_log_path:
@@ -315,8 +313,7 @@ def _pre_launch(self) -> None:
             self._remove_files.append(self._console_address)
 
         if self._qmp_set:
-            if self._remove_monitor_sockfile:
-                assert isinstance(self._monitor_address, str)
+            if isinstance(self._monitor_address, str):
                 self._remove_files.append(self._monitor_address)
             self._qmp_connection = QEMUMonitorProtocol(
                 self._monitor_address,
-- 
2.31.1


Reply via email to