On 17 October 2018 at 15:55, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 16.10.2018 um 19:25 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben:
>> Taking the address of a field in a packed struct is a bad idea, because
>> it might not be actually aligned enough for that pointer type (and
>> thus cause a crash on dereference on some host
Am 16.10.2018 um 19:25 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben:
> Taking the address of a field in a packed struct is a bad idea, because
> it might not be actually aligned enough for that pointer type (and
> thus cause a crash on dereference on some host architectures). Newer
> versions of clang warn about
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 06:25:03PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Taking the address of a field in a packed struct is a bad idea, because
> it might not be actually aligned enough for that pointer type (and
> thus cause a crash on dereference on some host architectures). Newer
> versions of clang
Taking the address of a field in a packed struct is a bad idea, because
it might not be actually aligned enough for that pointer type (and
thus cause a crash on dereference on some host architectures). Newer
versions of clang warn about this. Avoid the bug by not using the
"modify in place" byte
