On 26.10.2015 19:12, John Snow wrote:
> For more complex BDS trees that can be created under normal circumstances,
> we lose the ability to issue query commands because of our inability to
> re-construct the absolute filename.
>
> Instead, omit this field when it is a problem and present as much
On 10/26/2015 05:18 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 26.10.2015 19:12, John Snow wrote:
>> For more complex BDS trees that can be created under normal circumstances,
>> we lose the ability to issue query commands because of our inability to
>> re-construct the absolute filename.
>>
>> Instead, omit
On 26.10.2015 22:34, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 10/26/2015 05:18 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 26.10.2015 19:12, John Snow wrote:
>>> For more complex BDS trees that can be created under normal circumstances,
>>> we lose the ability to issue query commands because of our inability to
>>>
On 10/26/2015 12:12 PM, John Snow wrote:
> For more complex BDS trees that can be created under normal circumstances,
> we lose the ability to issue query commands because of our inability to
> re-construct the absolute filename.
>
> Instead, omit this field when it is a problem and present as
For more complex BDS trees that can be created under normal circumstances,
we lose the ability to issue query commands because of our inability to
re-construct the absolute filename.
Instead, omit this field when it is a problem and present as much information
as we can.
This will change the
