On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:08:43AM +, Li, Liang Z wrote:
Right now, we don't have an interface to detect that cases and
got back to the iterative stage.
How about go back to the iterative stage when detect that the
pending_size is larger Than max_size, like this:
Right now, we don't have an interface to detect that cases and
got back to the iterative stage.
How about go back to the iterative stage when detect that the
pending_size is larger Than max_size, like this:
+/* do flush here is aimed to shorten the VM
Li, Liang Z liang.z...@intel.com wrote:
Right now, we don't have an interface to detect that cases and got
back to the iterative stage.
How about go back to the iterative stage when detect that the
pending_size is larger Than max_size, like this:
+/* do flush here
Am 18.03.2015 um 13:36 hat Juan Quintela geschrieben:
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
The problem is that the block layer really doesn't have an option to
control what is getting synced once the data is cached outside of qemu.
Essentially we can do an fdatasync() or we can leave it,
