01.08.2017 18:41, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
07.02.2017 23:14, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/03/2017 09:47 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Minimal implementation: always send DF flag, to not deal with
fragmented
replies.
This works well with your minimal server implementation, but
07.02.2017 23:14, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/03/2017 09:47 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Minimal implementation: always send DF flag, to not deal with fragmented
replies.
This works well with your minimal server implementation, but I worry
that it will cause us to fall over when talking
On 07/02/2017 21:14, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/03/2017 09:47 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> Minimal implementation: always send DF flag, to not deal with fragmented
>> replies.
>
> This works well with your minimal server implementation, but I worry
> that it will cause us to fall
On 02/03/2017 09:47 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Minimal implementation: always send DF flag, to not deal with fragmented
> replies.
This works well with your minimal server implementation, but I worry
that it will cause us to fall over when talking to a fully-compliant
server that
Minimal implementation: always send DF flag, to not deal with fragmented
replies.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
---
block/nbd-client.c | 47 +++
block/nbd-client.h | 2 +
include/block/nbd.h | 15 +++--
nbd/client.c| 170